Cited by 98Latin American history and cultureAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

An Archaeological Perspective on the Andean Concept of Camaquen: Thinking Through Late Pre-Columbian Ofrendas and Huacas

Bray, Tamara L.·2009·Cambridge Archaeological Journal

Abstract

Ethnohistoric sources suggest that the indigenous inhabitants of Andean South America saw both people and things as animated or enlivened by a common vital force (camaquen). In approaching the subject of camaquen archaeologically, I attempt to place objects and their materiality at the analytical centre, rather than the normally privileged ethnohistoric or ethnographic data, in order to see what new insights into the nature of Pre-Columbian ontologies might be gained from ‘thinking through things’. In this, I follow recent theories premised on the idea that the traditional segregation of concepts and things may hinder understanding of alternative worlds. The study focuses specifically on the arrangements, relationality and referentiality between and among objects found in sacred and offering contexts dating to the Inca period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0959774309000547

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bray, T. L.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bray, Tamara L.
Venue
Cambridge Archaeological Journal
Published
2009-10
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
357-366
ISSN
  • 0959-7743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0540
OpenAlex
W2161353449
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
41.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cambridge Archaeological Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Human Biology (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Latin American history and culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
huacas, Inca period, materiality of objects, sacred objects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review