Cited by 20Archaeology and Rock Art StudiesArchaeological and Geological StudiesHistory of Emotions Research

Figuring the Group

DeMarrais, Elizabeth·2011·Cambridge Archaeological Journal

Abstract

This article focuses on the social group, asking how approaches to the representation of the group (in forms such as rock-art, images painted on pottery and three-dimensional caches of figurines) can help us understand the nature of collective experience in the past. Current research has concentrated on individuals (and their experiences) in past societies, while group dynamics have been neglected. Attention should be re-directed to the wide range of emotional experiences that we know affected individuals, particularly as part of their interactions with others, during rituals and other collective events in the past. Investigation of figurative representations over a sustained period provides one means of reconstructing the repetitive, stereotyped emotions, local rules, ‘non-rational’ propensities, moral sentiments, and shared emotions that shaped group life in past societies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0959774311000229

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approaches to community have sought to move beyond views of the group as a natural given arising out of coresidency or copresence, to how it emerges through convivial and emotional engagements between people, things, and landscapes.

    “Approaches to community have sought to move beyond views of the group as a natural given arising out of coresidency or copresence, to how it emerges through convivial and emotional engagements between people, things, and landscapes (DeMarrais 2011;Harris 2014;Whittle 2005).”

    From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as DeMarrais 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation

    Stevenson, A. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-016-9094-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works

    “Approaches to community have sought to move beyond views of the group as a natural given arising out of coresidency or copresence, to how it emerges through convivial and emotional engagements between people, things, and landscapes (DeMarrais 2011; Harris 2014; Whittle 2005).”
    Background

Authors
DeMarrais, E.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
DeMarrais, Elizabeth
Venue
Cambridge Archaeological Journal
Published
2011-06
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
165-186
ISSN
  • 0959-7743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0540
OpenAlex
W2109128181
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge Archaeological Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Emotions Research
Keywords
social groups, collective experience, group dynamics, emotional experience, ritual, figurines, rock art, figurative representation, shared emotions, moral sentiments, historical societies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review