Cited by 6Archaeology and Rock Art StudiesArchaeological and Geological StudiesAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New Perspectives on the Chronology and Meaning of Mont Bégo Rock Art (Alpes-Maritimes, France)

Huet, Thomas·2017·Cambridge Archaeological Journal

Abstract

In 1994, H. de Lumley's teams of researchers finished the colossal task—initiated more than 20 years earlier—of recording every pecked rock engraving of Mont Bégo's rock art. The following year, in the book Le grandiose et le sacré, Lumley defined the site as a sacred mountain and attributed rock engravings, considered as ex-votos, to the Early Bronze Age and the Bell Beaker period. However, it is hard to recognize what interpretations can be directly drawn from the data: some exceptional rock engravings are considered as representative of the whole corpus of rock engravings and the most numerous ones are considered as a ‘bruit de fond’ [background noise]. Furthermore, recognition of associations—where rock engravings are contemporaneous and significantly grouped—had been criticised, and the hypothesis that all the rock engravings can be considered as a single archaeological event seems also to be contradicted by studies of superimpositions. We developed a GIS and a comprehensive database, with statistics, to identify specific spatial configurations, seriation effects and, finally, the evolution of the rock art. By going further in the periodization, our aim is to propose some provisional hypotheses about the meaning of Mont Bégo's rock engravings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0959774316000524

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At Mount Bego, the repertory includes common Copper Age iconography such as weapons, oxen and ploughs, and in Valcamonica, Copper Age imagery includes daggers, deer and anthropomorphs.

    “At Mount Bego, the repertory includes common Copper Age iconography such as weapons, oxen and ploughs (de Lumley 1996; Huet 2017), and in Valcamonica, Copper Age imagery includes daggers, deer and anthropomorphs.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Huet, T.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Huet, Thomas
Venue
Cambridge Archaeological Journal
Published
2016-11-17
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
199-221
ISSN
  • 0959-7743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-0540
OpenAlex
W2550703443
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge Archaeological Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
petroglyphs, sacred mountains, votive offerings, Early Bronze Age, periodization, seriation, spatial configuration, superimposition, GIS database, Alpes-Maritimes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review