The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New Perspectives on the Chronology and Meaning of Mont Bégo Rock Art (Alpes-Maritimes, France)
Abstract
In 1994, H. de Lumley's teams of researchers finished the colossal task—initiated more than 20 years earlier—of recording every pecked rock engraving of Mont Bégo's rock art. The following year, in the book Le grandiose et le sacré, Lumley defined the site as a sacred mountain and attributed rock engravings, considered as ex-votos, to the Early Bronze Age and the Bell Beaker period. However, it is hard to recognize what interpretations can be directly drawn from the data: some exceptional rock engravings are considered as representative of the whole corpus of rock engravings and the most numerous ones are considered as a ‘bruit de fond’ [background noise]. Furthermore, recognition of associations—where rock engravings are contemporaneous and significantly grouped—had been criticised, and the hypothesis that all the rock engravings can be considered as a single archaeological event seems also to be contradicted by studies of superimpositions. We developed a GIS and a comprehensive database, with statistics, to identify specific spatial configurations, seriation effects and, finally, the evolution of the rock art. By going further in the periodization, our aim is to propose some provisional hypotheses about the meaning of Mont Bégo's rock engravings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At Mount Bego, the repertory includes common Copper Age iconography such as weapons, oxen and ploughs, and in Valcamonica, Copper Age imagery includes daggers, deer and anthropomorphs.
“At Mount Bego, the repertory includes common Copper Age iconography such as weapons, oxen and ploughs (de Lumley 1996; Huet 2017), and in Valcamonica, Copper Age imagery includes daggers, deer and anthropomorphs.”
From Art (Pre)History: Ritual, Narrative and Visual Culture in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe (2020) · cites this paper as Huet 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Art (Pre)History: Ritual, Narrative and Visual Culture in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe
Robb, J. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-020-09471-w · Cited by 30
“At Mount Bego, the repertory includes common Copper Age iconography such as weapons, oxen and ploughs (de Lumley 1996; Huet 2017), and in Valcamonica, Copper Age imagery includes daggers, deer and anthropomorphs.”
MethodA Comparative Study of Rock Art in Later Prehistoric Europe
Bradley, R. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108885638 · Cited by 18
Early to late Holocene vegetation and fire dynamics at the treeline in the Maritime Alps
Finsinger, W., Vanel, Q., Ribolini, A., & Tinner, W. (2020) · Vegetation History and Archaeobotany · doi:10.1007/s00334-020-00795-x · Cited by 20
“3, 4; Table 2; Huet 2017).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMorandi, L. F., Frémondeau, D., Müldner, G., et al. (2021) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-021-01418-w · Cited by 7
“…for the communities settled in the Liguro-Provençal arc is also shown by the Late Neolithic-Early Bronze Age anthropogenic indicators (Huet 2017a: 21–27) associated with the well-known rock engravings of Mt. Bégo, in the Maritime Alps (De Lumley 1995; Barfield and Chippindale 1997; Huet 2017b).”
BackgroundKerverdo, R., Lafuerza, S., Gorini, C., et al. (2025) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2025.109749
Stone and the gods: religious cognition and stone carving in first millennium AD northern Britain
Noble, G. (2026) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2025.2604283
Metadata
- Authors
- Huet, T.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Huet, Thomas
- ORCID
- Huet, Thomas
- Venue
- Cambridge Archaeological Journal
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2016-11-17
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-221
- ISSN
- 0959-7743 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-0540
- OpenAlex
- W2550703443
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge Archaeological Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- petroglyphs, sacred mountains, votive offerings, Early Bronze Age, periodization, seriation, spatial configuration, superimposition, GIS database, Alpes-Maritimes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review