Cited by 143

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sensorial Assemblages: Affect, Memory and Temporality in Assemblage Thinking

Hamilakis, Yannis·2017·Cambridge Archaeological Journal

Abstract

Archaeologists are familiar with the concept of assemblage, but in more recent years they have started problematizing it in interesting and innovative ways, beyond its common connotations of aggregation. Sociologists such as Manuel DeLanda and political philosophers such as Jane Bennett have been key influences in this move. These authors had adapted and modified the assemblage thinking of Deleuze and Guattari. In this article, an assemblage of sorts itself, I propose that we need to return to that original Deleuzian body of thinking and explore its richness further. Assemblages, temporary and deliberate heterogeneous arrangements of material and immaterial elements, are about the relationship of in-betweenness. I further suggest that sensoriality and affectivity, memory and multi-temporality are key features of assemblage thinking, and that assemblages also imply certain political effects. The omission of these features in the archaeological treatments of the concept may lead to mechanistic reincarnations of systems thinking, thus depriving the concept of its potential. Finally, I explore these ideas by considering communal eating and feasting events as powerful sensorial assemblages.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0959774316000676

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yannis Hamilakis (2017) argued that three features are usually disregarded in discussions of archaeological assemblages: the affective/sensorial, the mnemonic/temporal, and the political.

    “Yannis Hamilakis (2017) has argued that there are three features that are usually disregarded in discussions of archaeological assemblages: the affective/sensorial, the mnemonic/temporal, and the political.”
  • Hamilakis argues that an assemblage is a 'deliberate act of bringing together'.

    “Hamilakis (2017: 175) argues that an assemblage is a ' deliberate act of bringing together. '”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hamilakis, Y.
Venue
Cambridge Archaeological Journal
Published
2017-01-11
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
169-182
ISSN
  • 0959-7743
  • 1474-0540
Cited by
143
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review