The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sensorial Assemblages: Affect, Memory and Temporality in Assemblage Thinking
Abstract
Archaeologists are familiar with the concept of assemblage, but in more recent years they have started problematizing it in interesting and innovative ways, beyond its common connotations of aggregation. Sociologists such as Manuel DeLanda and political philosophers such as Jane Bennett have been key influences in this move. These authors had adapted and modified the assemblage thinking of Deleuze and Guattari. In this article, an assemblage of sorts itself, I propose that we need to return to that original Deleuzian body of thinking and explore its richness further. Assemblages, temporary and deliberate heterogeneous arrangements of material and immaterial elements, are about the relationship of in-betweenness. I further suggest that sensoriality and affectivity, memory and multi-temporality are key features of assemblage thinking, and that assemblages also imply certain political effects. The omission of these features in the archaeological treatments of the concept may lead to mechanistic reincarnations of systems thinking, thus depriving the concept of its potential. Finally, I explore these ideas by considering communal eating and feasting events as powerful sensorial assemblages.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yannis Hamilakis (2017) argued that three features are usually disregarded in discussions of archaeological assemblages: the affective/sensorial, the mnemonic/temporal, and the political.
“Yannis Hamilakis (2017) has argued that there are three features that are usually disregarded in discussions of archaeological assemblages: the affective/sensorial, the mnemonic/temporal, and the political.”
From Excavating Europe’s last fascist monument: The Valley of the Fallen (Spain) (2022) · cites this paper as Hamilakis, 2017
Hamilakis argues that an assemblage is a 'deliberate act of bringing together'.
“Hamilakis (2017: 175) argues that an assemblage is a ' deliberate act of bringing together. '”
From Excavating Europe’s last fascist monument: The Valley of the Fallen (Spain) (2022) · cites this paper as Hamilakis, 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping liminality: Critical frameworks for the GIS-based modelling of visibility
Gillings, M. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.004 · Cited by 38
Excavating Europe’s last fascist monument: The Valley of the Fallen (Spain)
González-Ruibal, A. (2022) · Journal of Social Archaeology · doi:10.1177/14696053211061486 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilakis, Y.
- Venue
- Cambridge Archaeological Journal
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-01-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-182
- ISSN
- 0959-7743
- 1474-0540
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review