The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coalescence and Defensive Communities: Insights from an Andean Hillfort Town
Abstract
Defensive and fortified settlements are often places of relatively dense nucleation by people with few viable alternatives, resulting in the imperative need to establish consensual rules for living together. What behaviours and attitudes were adopted in defensively nucleated places? Recent investigations at Ayawiri (Machu Llaqta), a densely settled hillfort town of the western Titicaca Basin of Peru inhabited c. ad 1300–1450, shed light on the nature of social life within the defensive community and the workings of social distinction, priority in settlement, conformity and publicity. I draw on the evidence from Ayawiri to discuss how defensive settlements create and reinforce certain ways of living by reformulating the basic logics of sociality and the material and spatial realms through which they work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The low relative proportion of outliers in the LIP is also consistent with the characterization of this period as a time of insularity, conflict, and constrained inter-regional interaction in the face of environmental challenges and Wari imperial dissolution (Arkush, 2018, Arkush, 2011, Bauer and Kellett, 2010, Kurin, 2016, Langlie and Arkush, 2016, Tung, et al., 2016).”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scaffidi, B. K., & Knudson, K. J. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2020.105121 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Arkush, E.
- Venue
- Cambridge Archaeological Journal
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-06-28
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 0959-7743
- 1474-0540
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coalescence and Defensive Communities: Insights from an Andean Hillfort Town. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0959774317000440
- The paper
- Arkush, E. (2018). Coalescence and Defensive Communities: Insights from an Andean Hillfort Town. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959774317000440