The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-dimensional integration: The quasi-Monte Carlo way
Abstract
This paper is a contemporary review of QMC (‘quasi-Monte Carlo’) methods, that is, equal-weight rules for the approximate evaluation of high-dimensional integrals over the unit cube [0,1]s, where s may be large, or even infinite. After a general introduction, the paper surveys recent developments in lattice methods, digital nets, and related themes. Among those recent developments are methods of construction of both lattices and digital nets, to yield QMC rules that have a prescribed rate of convergence for sufficiently smooth functions, and ideally also guaranteed slow growth (or no growth) of the worst-case error as s increases. A crucial role is played by parameters called ‘weights’, since a careful use of the weight parameters is needed to ensure that the worst-case errors in an appropriately weighted function space are bounded, or grow only slowly, as the dimension s increases. Important tools for the analysis are weighted function spaces, reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces, and discrepancy, all of which are discussed with an appropriate level of detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach
Ghanem, R., & Spanos, P. D. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3094-6 · Cited by 5,851
Aronszajn, N. (1950) · Transactions of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-1950-0051437-7 · Cited by 5,380
Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes
van der Vaart, A. W., & Wellner, J. A. (1996) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2545-2 · Cited by 5,014
Spline Models for Observational Data.
Muller, H.-G., & Wahba, G. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290434 · Cited by 4,928
Hammersley, J. M., & Handscomb, D. C. (1964) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5819-7 · Cited by 4,054
Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation
Devroye, L. (1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8643-8 · Cited by 4,041
On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals
Sobol', I. M. (1967) · USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0041-5553(67)90144-9 · Cited by 2,975
Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods.
Collings, B. J., & Niederreiter, H. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290359 · Cited by 2,884
Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods
Niederreiter, H. (1992) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970081 · Cited by 2,770
Methods of Numerical Integration.
S., F., Davis, P. J., & Rabinowitz, P. (1986) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2008014 · Cited by 2,735
Cited by
Effectively Unbiased FID and Inception Score and Where to Find Them
Chong, M. J., & Forsyth, D. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00611 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Dick, J., Kuo, F. Y., & Sloan, I. H.
- Venue
- Acta Numerica
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-04-02
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 133-288
- ISSN
- 0962-4929 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-0508
- OpenAlex
- W1978501336
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 45.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-dimensional integration: The quasi-Monte Carlo way. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0962492913000044
- The paper
- Dick, J., Kuo, F. Y., & Sloan, I. H. (2013). High-dimensional integration: The quasi-Monte Carlo way. Acta Numerica. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962492913000044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.