Cited by 5,014Probability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Methods and InferenceStochastic processes and statistical mechanics

Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes

van der Vaart, Aad W., Wellner, Jon A.·1996·Springer Series in Statistics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4757-2545-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Vaart, A. W., & Wellner, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Springer Series in Statistics
Published
1996
ISSN
0172-7397 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010353172
Cited by
5,014
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 235 · 2024: 208 · 2023: 196 · 2022: 192 · 2021: 241 · 2020: 275 · 2019: 268 · 2018: 204 · 2017: 216 · 2016: 225 · 2015: 235 · 2014: 248 · 2013: 251 · 2012: 226
FWCI
16.79
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer series in statistics (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Washington
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Keywords
weak convergence, empirical processes, stochastic convergence, probability theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review