Cited by 46Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Benefits of training/playing therapy in a group of captive lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla)

Open access
Carrasco, L, Colell, M, Calvo, M, Abelló, MT, Velasco, M, Posada, S·2009·Animal Welfare

Abstract

Animal well-being and enrichment continue to gain importance in the maintenance of primates living in captivity. Positive reinforcement training (PRT) and/or playing interaction have been shown to be effective in improving the well-being of several species of primates. This research study evaluated the effects of applying a combination of these two techniques (training/playing therapy) on a group of lowland gorillas(Gorilla gorilla gorilla). The effects of this combination on the behaviour of captive primates have been given very little attention to date. The behaviour of a group of seven females was recorded in two different phases at Barcelona Zoo: before (periods 1 and 2) and after (periods 3 and 4) a series of changes were made to the composition of this social group. In each period, two phases were distinguished: i) baseline condition, after the subjects became used to the researcher, focal recordings were made of the group's regular behaviour and, ii) experimental condition, the training and playing sessions (‘gorilla play’) with two specific subjects began one hour before the group went to the outdoor facility. The frequency and duration of the behaviour observed in each of the recording conditions were compared. The results showed positive changes in the gorillas’ behaviour: stereotypies, interactions with the public, aggression between subjects and inactivity were all reduced, while affiliative behaviour and individual and social play-related behaviour increased. Moreover, the benefits of this therapy were observed in trained individuals and the rest of the gorillas in the group, which would seem to indicate that training/playing can be used to create a more relaxed atmosphere, reducing social tension and improving the well-being of all the subjects involved.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0962728600000026

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on keeper-animal interactions in zoos has received very little attention, with only a few studies attempting to evaluate this relationship.

    “In comparison to the research that has been conducted in the domestic animal industries, research on keeper–animal interactions in zoos has received very little attention [34], with only a few studies attempting to evaluate this relationship [35,36,37,38,39,40].”
  • Gorillas who underwent training and play sessions with keepers showed lower rates of abnormal behaviour and higher levels of affiliative and intraspecies play behaviour.

    “Carrasco et al. [37]. found that gorillas who underwent training and play sessions with keepers showed lower rates of abnormal behaviour and higher levels of affiliative and intraspecies play behaviour.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Abelló MT 2007 Maternal training program results in two moth- er-reared infants for the first time. Gorilla Gazette 20(1): 12
  2. Baker KC 1997 Human interaction as enrichment for captive chimpanzees: preliminary report. American Journal of Primatology 42: 85-158
  3. Baker KC 2004 Benefits of positive human interaction for social- ly housed chimpanzees. Animal Welfare 13(2): 239-245
  4. Baker KC, Bloomsmith MA, Griffis C and Gierhart M 2003 Self-injurious behavior and response to human interaction as enrichment in rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology 60(1): 94-95
  5. Basset L, Buchanan-Smith HM, McKinley J and Smith TE 2003 Effects of training on stress-related behaviour of the com- mon marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) in relation to coping with rou- tine husbandry procedures. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6(3): 221-233
  6. Bloomsmith MA, Brent LY and Schapiro SJ 1991 Guidelines for developing and managing an environmental enrich- ment program for nonhuman primates. Laboratory Animal Science 41(4): 372-377
  7. Bloomsmith MA, Lambeth SP, Stone AM and Lauge GE 1997 Comparing two types of human interaction as enrichment for chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 42(2): 96
  8. Bloomsmith MA, Baker KC, Ross SK and Lambeth SP 1999 Comparing animal training to non-training human interac- tion as environmental enrichment for chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 49: 35
  9. Bloomsmith MA, Baker KC, Griffis C, Maloney M, Neu K, Schoof V and Martinez M 2005 Comparing training to human interaction as enrichment for captive rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 66(1): 178-179 Broom DM 1991 Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science 69: 41-65
  10. Bryant CE, Rupniak NMJ and Iversen SD 1988 Effects of dif- ferent environmental enrichment devices on cage stereotypies and autoaggression in captive cynomolgus monkeys. Journal of Medical Primatology 17: 257-269
  11. Buchanan-Smith HM 2003 The benefits of positive reinforce- ment training and its effects on human non-human animal interac- tions. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Symposium on Zoo Research. 7- 8 July 2003, Marwell Zoological Park, Winchester, UK
  12. Desmond T and Laule G 1994 Use of positive reinforcement training in the management of species for reproduction. Zoo Biology 13(5): 471-477
  13. Fraser D 1993 Assessing animal well-being: Common sense, un-common science. Food Animal Well-Being: Conference Proceedings and Deliberations pp 37-54. 13-15 April 1993, Indianapolis, USA Hill SP and Broom DM 2003 Home improvements: behav- ioral responses of captive gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) to enrich- ment efforts. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Symposium on Zoo Research pp 1-3. 7-8 July 2003, Marwell Zoological Park, Winchester, UK Hosey GR 2000 Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect? Animal Welfare 9: 343-357
  14. Jones R and Wehnelt S 2003 Two approaches to measure the effect of visitor numbers on orang-utan welfare. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Symposium on Zoo Research pp 133-138. 7-8 July 2003, Marwell Zoological Park, Winchester, UK
  15. Keane C and Marples N 2003 The effects of zoo visitors on gorilla behaviour. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Symposium on Zoo Research pp 144-154. 7-8 July 2003, Marwell Zoological Park, Winchester, UK Lambeth SP, Bloomsmith MA and Alford PL 1997 Effects of human activity on chimpanzee wounding. Zoo Biology 16: 327-333
  16. Laule GE 1992 Addressing psychological well-being: training as enrichment. AAZPA/CAZPA 1992 Annual Conference Proceedings: 415-422
  17. Laule GE, Bloomsmith MA and Schapiro SJ 1993 The use of positive reinforcement training techniques to enhance the care, management and welfare of primates in the laboratory. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6(3): 163-173
  18. McCormick W 2003 How enriching is training? Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Symposium on Zoo Research pp 9-17. 7-8 July 2003, Marwell Zoological Park, Winchester, UK

Authors
Carrasco, L., Colell, M., Calvo, M., Abelló, M., Velasco, M., & Posada, S.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • Barcelona Zoo Foundation (ES)
Corresponding author
Carrasco, L
Venue
Animal Welfare
Published
2009-02
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
9-19
ISSN
  • 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-1538
OpenAlex
W21926681
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
Funders
Generalitat de Catalunya
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
positive reinforcement training, lowland gorilla, Gorilla gorilla gorilla, captive primates, animal welfare, stereotypy, affiliative behavior, social play, aggression, enrichment, social group composition, zoo animals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review