The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of genetic selection for increased milk yield on the welfare of dairy cows
Abstract
Milk yield per cow has more than doubled in the previous 40 years and many cows now produce more than 20,000 kg of milk per lactation. The increase in production should be viewed with concern because: i) the increase in milk yield has been accompanied by declining fertility, increasing leg and metabolic problems and declining longevity; ii) there are unfavourable genetic correlations between milk yield and fertility, mastitis and other production diseases, indicating that deterioration in fertility and health is largely a consequence of selection for increased milk yield; and iii) high disease incidence, reduced fertility, decreased longevity and modification of normal behaviour are indicative of substantial decline in cow welfare. Improving welfare is important as good welfare is regarded by the public as indicative of sustainable systems and good product quality and may also be economically beneficial. Expansion of the Profitable Lifetime Index used in the UK to include mastitis resistance and fertility could increase economic response to selection by up to 80%, compared with selection for milk production alone. In the last 10 years, several breeding organisations in Europe and North America followed the example of Nordic Countries and have included improving fertility and reducing incidence of mastitis in their breeding objectives, but these efforts are still timid. A multi-trait selection programme in which improving health, fertility and other welfare traits are included in the breeding objective, and appropriately weighted relative to production traits, should be adopted by all breeding organisations motivated in their goal of improving welfare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE GENETIC BASIS FOR CONSTRUCTING SELECTION INDEXES
Hazel, L. N. (1943) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/28.6.476 · Cited by 1,835
Reproductive Loss in High-Producing Dairy Cattle: Where Will It End?
Lucy, M. C. (2001) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)70158-0 · Cited by 1,485
Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review
Rauw, W. M., Kanis, E., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E. N., & Grommers, F. J. (1998) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(98)00147-x · Cited by 1,113
Stress and Animal Welfare: Key Issues in the Biology of Humans and Other Animals
Broom, D. M., & Johnson, K. G. (2019) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32153-6 · Cited by 786
Self-citationFertility in the high-producing dairy cow
Pryce, J. E., Royal, M. D., Garnsworthy, P. C., & Mao, I. L. (2004) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(03)00145-3 · Cited by 553
Effects of energy balance on follicular development and first ovulation in postpartum dairy cows
Beam, S., & Butler, W. (2019) · Bioscientifica Proceedings · doi:10.1530/biosciprocs.4.032 · Cited by 524
Ingvartsen, K. L., Dewhurst, R. J., & Friggens, N. C. (2003) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(03)00110-6 · Cited by 481
Uterine diseases in cattle after parturition
Sheldon, I. M., Williams, E. J., Miller, A. N. A., Nash, D. M., & Herath, S. (2008) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.031 · Cited by 468
Heringstad, B., Klemetsdal, G., & Ruane, J. (2000) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/s0301-6226(99)00128-1 · Cited by 388
Consequences of Selection for Milk Yield from a Geneticist's Viewpoint
Hansen, L. B. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74980-0 · Cited by 263
Cited by
Dairy intensification: Drivers, impacts and alternatives
Clay, N., Garnett, T., & Lorimer, J. (2020) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-019-01177-y · Cited by 268
Impact of Facial Conformation on Canine Health: Brachycephalic Obstructive Airway Syndrome
Packer, R. M. A., Hendricks, A., Tivers, M. S., & Burn, C. C. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137496 · Cited by 238
Importance of outdoor shelter for cattle in temperate climates
Van laer, E., Moons, C. P. H., Sonck, B., & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2014) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.003 · Cited by 114
Health and welfare in organic livestock production systems—a systematic mapping of current knowledge
Åkerfeldt, M. P., Gunnarsson, S., Bernes, G., & Blanco-Penedo, I. (2021) · Organic Agriculture · doi:10.1007/s13165-020-00334-y · Cited by 69
Development of a welfare assessment protocol for dairy calves from birth through to weaning
Barry, J., Kennedy, E., Sayers, R., de Boer, I., & Bokkers, E. (2019) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.28.3.331 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Oltenacu, P., & Broom, D.
- Venue
- Animal Welfare
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 39-49
- ISSN
- 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-1538
- OpenAlex
- W2549055047
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of genetic selection for increased milk yield on the welfare of dairy cows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0962728600002220
- The paper
- Oltenacu, P., & Broom, D. (2010). The impact of genetic selection for increased milk yield on the welfare of dairy cows. Animal Welfare. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600002220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.