Cited by 195Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

The effect of the kennel environment on canine welfare: a critical review of experimental studies

Open access
Taylor, KD, Mills, DS·2007·Animal Welfare

Abstract

Dogs can be held temporarily or permanently in kennels for a number of reasons, not necessarily for their own benefit. Although restrictive environments have been associated with poor welfare, priorities for research and change cannot be understood unless the various aspects of the kennel environment are appreciated separately. This review critically evaluates the experimental research regarding the physical, social, sensory, occupational, nutritional and psychological aspects of the kennel environment and their effects on canine welfare, with a view to providing a consolidated report on our current state of knowledge on this subject. However, the lack of within-dog, single manipulations and a focus on quantitative measures affects the ability to make valid conclusions about the welfare benefits of several aspects, including social housing, kennel size and location. Despite these criticisms, the evidence for the positive benefits of group housing is strong. There is also considerable evidence for the benefits of positive human contact particularly on sociability and stress responses in other situations. Surprisingly few studies have looked at other forms of enrichment and even less have considered the potential for the kennel to be over-stimulating in an auditory, olfactory and visual sense. Such topics are suggested as priorities for further research, in addition to ways of minimising aggression in group housing and the effect of establishment of predictability on adjustment to kennelling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0962728600027378

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dogs placed in the shelter environment face various stressors, such as disruptive sounds, movement restrictions, and the loss of social connections.

    “Dogs placed in the shelter environment face various stressors, such as disruptive sounds, movement restrictions, and the loss of social connections [176].”

    From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [176]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, K., & Mills, D.
Affiliations
University of Lincoln (GB)
Venue
Animal Welfare
Published
2007-11
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
435-447
ISSN
  • 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-1538
OpenAlex
W1564312297
Cited by
195
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Dogs Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Keywords
dog welfare, dogs, group housing, social housing, sensory enrichment, human contact, stress response, sociability, aggression, predictability, nutritional status, working conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review