The effect of the kennel environment on canine welfare: a critical review of experimental studies
Open accessAbstract
Dogs can be held temporarily or permanently in kennels for a number of reasons, not necessarily for their own benefit. Although restrictive environments have been associated with poor welfare, priorities for research and change cannot be understood unless the various aspects of the kennel environment are appreciated separately. This review critically evaluates the experimental research regarding the physical, social, sensory, occupational, nutritional and psychological aspects of the kennel environment and their effects on canine welfare, with a view to providing a consolidated report on our current state of knowledge on this subject. However, the lack of within-dog, single manipulations and a focus on quantitative measures affects the ability to make valid conclusions about the welfare benefits of several aspects, including social housing, kennel size and location. Despite these criticisms, the evidence for the positive benefits of group housing is strong. There is also considerable evidence for the benefits of positive human contact particularly on sociability and stress responses in other situations. Surprisingly few studies have looked at other forms of enrichment and even less have considered the potential for the kennel to be over-stimulating in an auditory, olfactory and visual sense. Such topics are suggested as priorities for further research, in addition to ways of minimising aggression in group housing and the effect of establishment of predictability on adjustment to kennelling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dogs placed in the shelter environment face various stressors, such as disruptive sounds, movement restrictions, and the loss of social connections.
“Dogs placed in the shelter environment face various stressors, such as disruptive sounds, movement restrictions, and the loss of social connections [176].”
From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [176]
Cites
Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence
Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. (1976) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.105.1.3 · Cited by 2,494 · see citing works
Manifestations of chronic and acute stress in dogs
Beerda, B., Schilder, M. B. H., van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., & de Vries, H. W. (1997) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(96)01131-8 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Behavioral and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats
Carlstead, K., Brown, J. L., & Strawn, W. (1993) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/0168-1591(93)90062-t · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Hennessy, M. B., T. Williams, M., Miller, D. D., Douglas, C. W., & Voith, V. L. (1998) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(98)00179-8 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Tuber, D. S., Hennessy, M. B., Sanders, S., & Miller, J. A. (1996) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.103 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
An Audit of Behavioral Indicators of Poor Welfare in Kenneled Dogs in the United Kingdom
Stephen, J. M., & Ledger, R. A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science · doi:10.1207/s15327604jaws0802_1 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
‘The effect of different genres of music on the stress levels of kennelled dogs’
Bowman, A., Dowell, F. J., & Evans, N. P. (2017) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.01.024 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Powell, L., Reinhard, C., Satriale, D., Morris, M., Serpell, J., & Watson, B. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87649-2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding
Menor-Campos, D. J. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14050756 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Dogs placed in the shelter environment face various stressors, such as disruptive sounds, movement restrictions, and the loss of social connections [176].”
BackgroundNogueira, L. B., Palme, R., & Mendonça-Furtado, O. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11082264 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Taylor, K., & Mills, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Lincoln (GB)
- Venue
- Animal Welfare
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-447
- ISSN
- 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-1538
- OpenAlex
- W1564312297
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Dogs Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Keywords
- dog welfare, dogs, group housing, social housing, sensory enrichment, human contact, stress response, sociability, aggression, predictability, nutritional status, working conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review