Cited by 46Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

A Comparison of the Activity Budgets of Wild and Captive Sulawesi Crested Black Macaques(Macaca Nigra)

Open access
Melfi, V A, Feistner, A T C·2002·Animal Welfare

Abstract

One aim of environmental enrichment techniques is to replicate ‘wild-like’ behaviour in captivity. In this study, three captive troops of Sulawesi crested black macaques(Macaca nigra)were each observed for 100 h in large naturalistic enclosures. Activity budgets constructed from these observations were compared with published data collected from wild troops in the DuaSudara Nature Reserve, Sulawesi (O ‘Brien & Kinnaird 1997). No significant difference was found between the activity budgets of the wild and the captive macaques, although social, resting and feeding behaviours were significantly different between zoos. There was more rest and less movement and feeding in captivity, although these differences were not significant. The relatively large number of individuals, the wide variety of age-sex classes and the large and complex naturalistic enclosures provided for them may have been important factors in promoting wild-like behaviour. This study shows that captive primates can exhibit wild-type activity budgets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0962728600028165

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reductions in both size and complexity of the captive environment can restrict the diversity and flexibility of animal behavior.

    “Reductions in both size (Veasey et al., 1996) and complexity (Moreira et al., 2007) of the captive environment can restrict the diversity and flexibility of animal behavior (Melfi and Feistner, 2002).”

    From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Melfi and Feistner, 2002

    The Discussion reports that macaques at one zoo moved and fed less than those at the others and identifies enclosure size and complexity as possible factors. It also says larger enclosures appeared associated with less resting, but complexity was not quantified. These passages support a possible effect on particular behaviours, not the broader claim that reduced size and complexity restrict behavioural diversity and flexibility in animals generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Activity budgets represent the standard metric in behavioral welfare assessment.

    “Alternatively, activity budgets represent the standard metric in behavioral welfare assessment (Melfi and Feistner, 2002).”

    From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Melfi and Feistner, 2002

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Beck B B, Kleiman D G, Dietz J M, Castro I, Carvalho C, Matris A and Rettberg-Beck B 1991 Losses and reproduction in reintroduced golden lion tarnarins (Leontopithecus rosalia). Dodo, Journal of the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust 27: 50-61
  2. Box H 0 1991 Training for life after release: simian primates as examples. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 62: 111-123
  3. Kleiman D G, Allen M E, Thompson K V and Lumpkin S (eds) Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques pp 317- 333. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA
  4. Chamove A S 1988 Assessing the welfare of captive primates -a critique. In: Symposium of Laboratory Animal Welfare Research -Primates pp 39-49.
  5. Chamove A S, Anderson J R, Morgan-Jones S C and Jones S P 1982 Deep wood chip litter: hygiene, feeding and behavioural enrichment in eight primate specics. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems 3: 308-318
  6. Dixson A F 1977 Observations on the displays, menstrual cycles and sexual behaviour of the 'Black ape' or Celebes (Macaca nigra). Journal of Zoology 182: 63-84
  7. Fowler J and Cohen L 1996 Practical Statistics for Field Biology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, West Sussex, UK
  8. Hancock D 1980 Bringing nature into the zoo: inexpensive solutions for zoo environments. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems 1: 170-177
  9. Kerridge F J 1996 Behavioural enrichment of ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata) based upon a wild-captive comparison of their behaviour. PhD thesis, Bolton Institute, University of Manchester, UK
  10. Kleiman D G, Beck B B, Dietz L A, Ballaie J D and Coimbra-Filho A F 1986 Conservation program for the golden lion tamarin: captive research and management, ecological studies, educational strategies and reintroduction. In: Benirschke K (ed) Primates, The Road to Self-Sustaining Population pp 959-979. Springer-Verlag: New York, USA
  11. Lees C 1993 Managing harems in captivity: the Sulawesi crested macaque (Macaca nigra). MSc thesis, DICE, University of Kent, UK
  12. Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Jersey O'Brien T and Kinnaird M 1997 Behaviour, diet and movement of the Sulawesi crested black macaque (Macaca nigra). International Journal of Prima tology 18: 321-351
  13. Redshaw M E and Mallinson J J C 1991 Learning from the wild: improving the psychological well-being of captive primates. Dodo, Journal of the Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust 27: 18-26
  14. Seidensticker J and Doherty J G 1996 Integrating animal behaviour and exhibit design. In: Kleiman 0 G, Allen ME, Thompson K V and Lumpkin S (eds) Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques pp 180-190. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA
  15. Stolba A and Wood-Gush D G M 1984 The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs. Annalles Recherche Veterinairie 15 (21): 287-298 SPSS 1999 SPSS® Base 10.0 Applications Guide. SPSS Inc: Chicago, USA
  16. Woolverton W L, Ator N A, Beardsley P M and Carroll M E 1989 Effects of environmental conditions on the psychological well-being of primates: a review of literature. Life Sciences 44: 901-917

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melfi, V. A., & Feistner, A. T. C.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust (JE)
Corresponding author
Melfi, V A
Venue
Animal Welfare
Published
2002-05
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
213-222
ISSN
  • 0962-7286 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-1538
OpenAlex
W2612087217
Cited by
46
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Animal Welfare (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
Macaca nigra, activity budget, captive primates, environmental enrichment, zoo animal welfare, social behavior, feeding behaviour, resting behavior, group size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review