Cited by 202Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Effects of environmental enrichment on reproduction

Carlstead, Kathy, Shepherdson, David·1994·Zoo Biology

Abstract

Although there have been few demonstrations of a direct empirical relationship between environmental enrichment and reproductive success in captive animals, indirect and anecdotal evidence indicates the importance of physical and temporal complexity for reproduction. We discuss three major mechanisms through which environmental enrichment that specifically increases the complexity of an animal's surroundings may influence reproductive physiology and behavior: developmental processes, modulation of stress and arousal, and modification of social interactions. In complex environments developing animals learn that performing active behavior produces appropriate functional outcomes. Learning to control their environment influences their ability to adapt to novel situations, which may profoundly influence their reproductive behavior as adults in breeding situations. Chronic stress may compromise reproductive physiology and behavior; enrichment reduces stress by providing increased opportunity for behavioral coping responses. However, some degree of acute stress may be beneficial for reproduction by maintaining an animal's level of responsiveness to socio‐sexual stimuli necessary for sexual arousal and reproductive activation. Finally, environmental enrichment may influence reproductive success by stabilizing social groups, reducing aggression and increasing affiliative and play behaviors. It is concluded that multi‐variate multi‐institutional behavioral research in zoos will play a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/zoo.1430130507

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quantity and quality of substrates and effective environmental enrichment are areas where improving the wellbeing of animals can be interconnected with improving the outcomes of breeding programs.

    “The quantity and quality of substrates and effective environmental enrichment have been highlighted as areas where improving the wellbeing of animals can be interconnected with improving the outcomes of breeding programs [76].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlstead, K., & Shepherdson, D.
Affiliations
  • Smithsonian Institution (US)
  • Oregon Zoo (US)
Corresponding author
Carlstead, Kathy
Venue
Zoo Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
447-458
ISSN
  • 0733-3188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2361
OpenAlex
W1991949166
Cited by
202
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zoo Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
environmental enrichment, reproductive success, captive animals, zoo animals, stress, arousal, social interaction, aggression, affiliative behavior, play behavior, reproductive physiology, reproductive behavior, captive breeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review