Cited by 7Palliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Physician-Assisted Suicide in Psychiatry: Developments in the Netherlands

Legemaate, Johan, Gevers, J.K.M.·1997·Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

Abstract

For more than two decades euthanasia and assisted suicide have been openly debated in the Netherlands. This development started in 1973 when the Regional Court in Leeuwarden decided a case in which a physician had administered a deadly dose of morphine to her terminally ill mother on the mother's serious and persistent request. In this case the court concluded that the average Dutch physician no longer considered it his or her duty to prolong a patient's life under all circumstances. The court accepted that in specific cases a physician is allowed to prevent serious and irreversible suffering, even if the patient's life is short ened. This case was the first in which a legal opening for euthanasia or assisted suicide was created. In this specific case the physician was formally declared guilty, but the court gave her a suspended sentence of one week imprisonment. This decision started a debate on euthanasia and assisted suicide throughout all levels of Dutch society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0963180100007799

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Legemaate, J., & Gevers, J. K. M.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Published
1997
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
175-188
ISSN
  • 0963-1801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2147
OpenAlex
W2126849559
Cited by
7
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia, psychiatry, Netherlands, morphine, terminal illness, right to die, medical ethics
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Criminal Law, Ethics, Medical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Psychiatry, Stress, Psychological, Mental Competency, Suicide, Assisted, Advisory Committees, Euthanasia, Active, Mentally Ill Persons, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary, Judicial Role, Wedge Argument

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review