The Italian version of the Zarit Burden Interview: a validation study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Caregiving experiences in dementia may have adverse effects on the caregiver's own physical and mental health. The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) is the most widely used instrument for assessing family carer burden and the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the ZBI (I-ZBI). METHODS: I-ZBI was administered to a non-randomized sample of 273 caregivers related to consecutively attending outpatients with a previously established primary diagnosis of dementia, according to DSM-IV criteria. Measurements used for the construct validity of the instrument were the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R). Validity and reliability were evaluated, as well as the factor structure of the instrument. RESULTS: Most caregivers were children (65%), female (72%) and living with the patient (53%), with quite a high level of burden. The I-ZBI demonstrates good reliability with high internal consistency (α = 0.90) and split-half correlation of 0.78, and good concurrent validity with other assessment tools. A five-factor solution was obtained for the I-ZBI and the original bi-factorial structure of the ZBI was not confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of the Zarit Burden Interview is valid, reliable and useful for use in clinical contexts and in future studies that could lead to a better understanding of carer burden in dementia. Clarifying the factorial structure of the ZBI would help to further the understanding of the large body of research using it and would also help to advance the understanding of subjective burden.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The CQOLC scale has adequate psychometric properties: test-retest reliability of 0.95, internal consistency of 0.9, and a four-factor structure.
“Esta herramienta presentó adecuadas propiedades psicométricas, con una confiabilidad test-retest de 0,95, consistencia interna de 0,9 y análisis factorial de estructura de cuatro factores (28-30).”
From Factores relacionados con sobrecarga del cuidador informal de pacientes con cáncer avanzado (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
The Results (page unavailable) report internal consistency of 0.90 and a five-factor structure for the Italian Zarit Burden Interview, not the CQOLC. A search for CQOLC and test–retest reliability of 0.95 found no passage addressing the claimed CQOLC properties; the matching 0.90 does not establish a result for that different scale. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Dementia care: mental health effects, intervention strategies, and clinical implications
Sörensen, S., Duberstein, P., Gill, D., & Pinquart, M. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70599-3 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- [1]1. Ankri, J. ∙ Andrieu, S. ∙ Beaufils, B. ... Beyond the global score of the Zarit Burden Interview: useful dimensions for clinicians International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2005; 20:254-260 Crossref Scopus (88) PubMed Google Scholar
- [2]2. Arai, Y. ∙ Washio, M. Burden felt by family caring for the elderly members needing care in southern Japan Aging and Mental Health. 1999; 3:158-164 Crossref Scopus (52) Google Scholar
- [3]3. Bellantuono, C. ∙ Fiorio, R. ∙ Zanotonelli, R. ... Psychiatric screening in general practice in Italy: a validity study of the GHQ Social Psychiatry. 1987; 22:113-117 Crossref Scopus (0) PubMed Google Scholar
- [4]4. Brodaty, H. Towards harmonisation of caregiver outcome measures Brain Aging. 2002; 2:3-12 Google Scholar
- [5]5. Costantini, M. Detecting psychological distress in cancer patients: validity of the Italian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Support Care Cancer. 1999; 7:121-127 Crossref Scopus (478) PubMed Google Scholar
- [6]6. Derogatis, L.R. SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale preliminary report Psychopharmacology Bulletin. 1973; 9:13-28 PubMed Google Scholar
- [8]8. Hébert, R.S. ∙ Bravo, G. ∙ Préville, M. Reliability, validity and reference values of the Zarit Burden Interview for assessing informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with dementia Canadian Journal on Aging. 2000; 19:494-507 Crossref Google Scholar
- [9]9. Katz, S. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psycholosocial function JAMA. 1963; 185:914-919 Crossref Scopus (0) PubMed Google Scholar
- [10]10. Knight, B.G. ∙ Fox, L.S. ∙ Chou, C.P. Factor structure of the Burden Interview Journal of Clinical Geropsychology. 2000; 6:249-258 Crossref Google Scholar
- [11]11. Kumamoto, K. ∙ Arai, Y. Validation of “personal strain” and “role strain”: subscales of the short version of the Japanese version of the Zarit Burden Interview (J-ZBI_8) Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2004; 58:606-610 Crossref Scopus (0) PubMed Google Scholar
- [12]12. Lawton, M.P. ∙ Brody, E.M. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living Gerontologist. 1969; 9:179-186 Crossref Scopus (14683) PubMed Google Scholar
- [13]13. Mahoney, R. ∙ Regan, C. ∙ Katona, C. ... Anxiety and depression in family caregivers of people with Alzheimer disease: the LASER-AD study American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2005; 13:795-801 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (0) PubMed Google Scholar
- [14]14. Measso, G. The Mini-mental State Examination: normative study of an Italian random sample Developmental Neuropsychology. 1993; 9:77-85 Crossref Scopus (0) Google Scholar
- [15]15. Mittelman, M.S. Psychosocial intervention research: challenges, strategies and measurement issues Aging and Mental Health. 2008; 12:1-4 Crossref Scopus (0) PubMed Google Scholar
- [16]16. Moniz-Cook, E. A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care Aging and Mental Health. 2008; 12:14-29 Crossref Scopus (0) PubMed Google Scholar
- [17]17. O'Rouke, N. ∙ Tuokko, H. Psychometric properties of an abridged version of the Zarit Burden Interview within a representative Canadian caregiver sample The Gerontologist. 2003; 43:121-127 Crossref Scopus (121) PubMed Google Scholar
- [18]18. Pearlin, L.I. Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures The Gerontologist. 1990; 30:583-594 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
- [19]19. Schreiner, A.S. ∙ Morimoto, T. ∙ Arai, Y. ... Assessing family caregiver's mental health using a statistically derived cut-off score for the Zarit Burden Interview Aging and Mental Health. 2006; 10:107-111 Crossref Scopus (0) PubMed Google Scholar
- [20]20. Siegert, R.J. ∙ Jackson, D. ∙ Tennant, A. ... Factor analysis and Rasch analysis of the Zarit Burden Interview for acquired brain injury carer research Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2010; 42:302-309 Crossref Scopus (0) PubMed Google Scholar
- [22]22. Zarit, S.H. ∙ Femia, E.E. A future for family care and dementia intervention research? Challenges and strategies Aging and Mental Health. 2008; 12:5-13 Crossref Scopus (0) PubMed Google Scholar
- [25]25. Zarit, S.H. ∙ Reever, K.E. ∙ Bach-Peterson, J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden The Gerontologist. 1980; 20:649-655 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
- [26]26. Zigmond, A.S. ∙ Snaith, R.P. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983; 67:361-370 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Article metrics Related Articles We haven't found any related articles. Advertisement Hide CaptionDownloadSee figure in Article Toggle Thumbstrip Download .PPT Home Access for Developing Countries Articles & Issues Articles in Press Current Issue List of Issues For Authors Submit a Manuscript Author Information Open Access Permissions Researcher Academy Journal Info About the Journal Abstracting/Indexing Contact Information Editorial Board Info for Advertisers Reprints New Content Alerts IPA The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals. All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier Inc., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply. Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions Accessibility Help & Contact Responsible AI RELX Thanks for sharing! AddToAny More… We use cookies that are necessary to make our site work. We may also use additional cookies to analyze, improve, and personalize our content and your digital experience. You can manage your cookie preferences using theCookie settings link. For more information, see ourCookie Policy Company Logo Opt-Out Request Honored Cookie Preference Center We use cookies which are necessary to make our site work. We may also use additional cookies to analyse, improve and personalise our content and your digital experience. For more information, see our Cookie Policy and the list of Google Ad-Tech Vendors. You may choose not to allow some types of cookies. However, blocking some types may impact your experience of our site and the services we are able to offer. See the different category headings below to find out more or change your settings. You may also be able to exercise your privacy choices Cookie Settings | Your Privacy Choices as described in our Privacy Policy Manage Consent Preferences Strictly Necessary Cookies Always active These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. Functional Cookies These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly. Performance Cookies These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. Targeting Cookies These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising. Cookie List label Consent Leg.Interest label label label Powered by Onetrust
Cited by
Sorted by citations
del-Pino-Casado, R., Priego-Cubero, E., López-Martínez, C., & Orgeta, V. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247143 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
“, 2011 [50] 273 Cross-sectional Dementia ZBI HADS Coleman et al.”
BackgroundNemcikova, M., Katreniakova, Z., & Nagyova, I. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1104250 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
van Roij, J., Brom, L., Sommeijer, D., van de Poll-Franse, L., Raijmakers, N., & on behalf of the eQuiPe study group (2021) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06365-9 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Lucijanić, J., Baždarić, K., Librenjak, D., Lucijanić, M., Hanževački, M., & Jureša, V. (2020) · Croatian Medical Journal · doi:10.3325/cmj.2020.61.527 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Factores relacionados con sobrecarga del cuidador informal de pacientes con cáncer avanzado
Hernández Castillo, C. I., Muñoz Medina, S. E., & Sánchez Pedraza, R. (2024) · Avances en Enfermería · doi:10.15446/av.enferm.v42n1.106557 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chattat, R., Cortesi, V., Izzicupo, F., Del Re, M. L., Sgarbi, C., Fabbo, A., & Bergonzini, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Chattat, Rabih
- Venue
- International Psychogeriatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 797-805
- ISSN
- 1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096997141
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- Zarit Burden Interview, caregiver burden, dementia, family caregivers, Italian translation, psychometric validation, factor structure, reliability statistics, subjective burden, caregiver health
- MeSH terms
- Dementia, Family Health, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Italy, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Caregivers, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review