Cited by 53Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and Disability

Impact of social network on cognitive performances and age-related cognitive decline across a 20-year follow-up

Open access
Stoykova, Ralitsa, Matharan, Fanny, Dartigues, Jean-François, Amieva, Hélène·2011·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between social network and cognitive decline, taking into account the potential bias of reverse causality. METHODS: The study sample comprised 2055 elderly participants without dementia. We assessed baseline social functioning across four variables: size of social network, satisfaction with relationships, perception of being understood, and participation in social activities. A neuropsychological battery was proposed at baseline and repeated throughout follow-up. Linear mixed models were used to investigate the relationship between social network and baseline cognitive performances and cognitive decline during the 20-year follow-up. RESULTS: When controlling for the reverse causality bias by excluding participants who developed dementia during the study follow-up and after adjusting for covariates, the results showed that better social functioning at baseline was associated with better initial performances in the Isaacs Set Test and the Wechsler Paired Associate Test. However, there was no significant association with further cognitive decline. By contrast, when the bias of reverse causality was not controlled for (i.e. no exclusion of participants who developed dementia), the association between social network and global cognitive decline measured by MMSE was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: With the opportunity to exclude participants who developed dementia, and the particularly long follow-up of participants, we were able to investigate the relationship between social networks and age-related cognitive decline with a minimization of reverse causality bias. The results suggest that even though higher social functioning is concomitantly associated with better cognitive performances, it may not prevent subsequent decline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610211001165

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stoykova, R., Matharan, F., Dartigues, J.-F., & Amieva, H.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Stoykova, Ralitsa
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
1405-1412
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009406382
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
social networks, social functioning, cognitive decline, age-related cognitive decline, dementia, older adults, social satisfaction, social participation (health and rehabilitation), cognitive performance, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review