Cited by 52Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Caregivers' experience of the decision-making process for placing a person with dementia into a nursing home: comparing caregivers from Chinese ethnic minority with those from English-speaking backgrounds

Open access
Caldwell, Lauren, Low, Lee-Fay, Brodaty, Henry·2014·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The experience of care transitions for people with dementia from ethnic minority groups has been poorly researched. Few studies have examined the decision to put someone on a waiting list for a nursing home and then actually accept a place. Many nursing homes have long waiting lists, but sometimes offers of a place are declined. Our aims were to investigate the decision-making process for placing a person with dementia on a waiting list for a nursing home, why offers of a place are accepted or declined, and the influence of cultural factors, comparing caregivers from Chinese and English-speaking backgrounds. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 27 caregivers of people with dementia on waiting lists or living in nursing homes (20 Chinese background and seven English-speaking background) were conducted, with thematic analysis of factors affecting caregivers' decision-making. RESULTS: Caregivers were at different stages of decision-making when they applied for a waiting list - some were ready for placement, others applied "just in case," and for some there was no waiting time because of an urgent need for placement. Caregivers' decisions were influenced by their emotions and expectations of nursing homes. The decision-making process was similar for both cultural groups, but Chinese caregivers spoke more about their sense of duty, the need for a Chinese specific facility, and declining a place because of family disagreement. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding cultural issues, including stereotypes and concerns about nursing homes, and providing better information about admission processes may help caregivers by allaying their anxiety about nursing home placement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610213002020

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caldwell, L., Low, L.-F., & Brodaty, H.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Low, Lee-Fay
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
413-424
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163353290
Cited by
52
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
dementia, nursing home admission, care transitions, caregiver decision-making, cultural factors, admission decisions, family disagreement
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Decision Making, Female, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Institutionalization, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Nursing Homes, Social Identification, Social Responsibility, Social Values, Waiting Lists, Caregivers, Qualitative Research, Asian People, Emigrants and Immigrants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review