Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 35Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The use of Arginine Vasopressin in neonates following the Norwood procedure

Abstract

Background Following the Norwood palliation, neonates may require an escalation of inotropic and vasoactive support. Arginine Vasopressin may be uniquely useful in supporting this population. Materials and methods A retrospective evaluation of neonates at this institution between November, 2007 and October, 2010 who received Arginine Vasopressin following the Norwood procedure. Data were recorded from the patient records at one hour prior to, and then 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours following Arginine Vasopressin initiation. Results We included 28 neonates. The mean dose of Arginine Vasopressin was 0.0005 plus or minus 0.0003 units per kilogram per minute. There was an early response (less than 6 hours) characterised by an 8% increase in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.0004), a 100% increase in urine output (p = 0.02), and a 29% decrease in total fluid administration (p = 0.04). The late response (at 24 hours) revealed further increases in systolic blood pressure and urine output as well as a 53% decrease in serum lactate (p = 0.007) and increase in arterial pH from 7.36 to 7.45 (p less than 0.0001). These changes were not accompanied by increases in heart rate or inotrope score. Conclusions The initiation of Arginine Vasopressin in post-operative Norwood patients was temporally associated with an improvement in markers of perfusion including systolic blood pressure, urine output, lactate, and pH. Further studies are required to ascertain the efficacy of Arginine Vasopressin in th…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1047951111000370

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Burton, G. L., Kaufman, J., Goot, B. H., & da Cruz, E. M.
Affiliations
Children's Hospital Colorado (US)
Corresponding author
da Cruz, Eduardo M.
Venue
Cardiology in the Young
Published
2011-04-19
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
536-544
ISSN
  • 1047-9511 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-1107
OpenAlex
W2130570922
Cited by
35
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cardiology in the Young (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
vasopressin, Norwood procedure, neonates, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, vasoactive support, inotropic support, hemodynamic response, urine output, serum lactate, arterial pH, systolic blood pressure, postoperative care
MeSH terms
Arginine Vasopressin, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Postoperative Care, Retrospective Studies, Vasoconstrictor Agents, Norwood Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.