CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 107Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchOccupational Health and PerformanceStress and Burnout Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Occupational Risk Factors in the Emergency Medical Services

Donnelly, Elizabeth, Siebert, Darcy·2009·Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
DOI 10.1017/s1049023x00007251
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: During a medical emergency, the American public often relies on the expertise of emergency medical technicians (EMTs). These professionals face a number of occupational hazards, and the literature suggests that EMTs are at a greater risk of developing physical and mental stress-related disorders. The purpose of this paper is to systematically examine gaps in the extant literature and to present a theoretically driven conceptual model to serve as a basis for future intervention and research efforts. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted utilizing relevant databases (e.g., PsychInfo, Medline). All empirical articles regarding emergency medical responders were reviewed, but given the limited research available, relevant theoretical and conceptual literature on the constructs of interest in other, related populations also were included. Based on this extensive review, a modification of the stress process model is suggested to explain the relationships among occupational stress exposure, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and high-risk alcohol and other drug use. RESULTS: Exposure to traumatic events was reported to be between 80% and 100% among EMTs, and rates of PTSD are >20%. High-risk alcohol and drug use rates among other emergency response professionals were reported to be as high as 40%. The proposed model suggests direct linkages between occupationally related stress exposure, including chronic and critical incident stress, PTSD, and high-risk alcohol and other drug use. Social support and personal resources (e.g., coping, locus of control) are proposed to have mediating and moderating influences on the three main constructs, and cohesion is introduced as an important, idiosyncratic influence in this population. The moderating influences of gender, age, ethnicity, marital status, and socioeconomic status, level of training, and years of service are included in the proposed model. CONCLUSIONS: High-risk alcohol and other drug use and post-traumatic symptomatology pose substantial risks for EMTs, and consequently, for the patients they serve. It is imperative that researchers develop and test a theoretically grounded model of risk and protective factors that will guide intervention development and future study. The model suggested in this paper, based on a comprehensive literature review and development of theory, represents a critical first step in the intervention research process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1049023x00007251

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.279 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0022-006X.63.3.361 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Greene, 2006, FDNY Crisis Counseling
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.839 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/jts.2490090107 · DOI
  6. Moran, 1997, An evaluation of humour in emergency work, The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 3
  7. 10.1023/A:1021934725246 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/jts.2490090106 · DOI
  9. 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Text revision
  10. McNeill, 1993, Alcohol and the Police Workplace
  11. 10.1037/0022-006X.59.2.274 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Donnelly, E., & Siebert, D.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Donnelly, Elizabeth
ORCID
Venue
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2009-10
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
422-429
ISSN
  • 0882-7397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1049-023X
  • 1945-1938
DOI
10.1017/s1049023x00007251
OpenAlex
W1975869750
Cited by
107
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 1001 d)
Locations
  • Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
emergency medical technicians, occupational stress, post-traumatic stress disorder, substance use, critical incident stress, stress process model, social support, coping, locus of control, cohesion, protective factors, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Alcohol Drinking, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Medical Technicians, Humans, Models, Psychological, Risk Factors, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Occupational Health, Occupational Exposure, Workplace, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review