The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anatomy of a Rally Effect: George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism
Abstract
The “rally-round-the-flag effect” sparked by the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington and by President George W. Bush's prompt launching of the War on Terrorism cries out for the kind of timely analysis that political scientists sometimes can provide. A rally effect is the sudden and substantial increase in public approval of the president that occurs in response to certain kinds of dramatic international events involving the United States. The September 11 rally effect is distinctive for at least three reasons. First, of all the recorded rally effects, it is the largest. Bush's approval rating soared in the Gallup Poll from 51% on September 10 to 86% on September 15.The president's approval rating is the percentage of survey respondents who answer “approve” to the question: “Do you approve or disapprove of the job [name] is doing as president?” This 35-point increase nearly doubles the previous record, the 18-point boost triggered by his father's launch of Operation Desert Storm in January 1991. Second, the further increase in Bush's approval rating to 90% on September 22 represents the highest rating ever recorded for a president (Morin 2001). Third, the September 11 rally effect has lasted longer than any in the history of polling. As of November 10, 2002, Bush's approval rating was 68%—22 points below its peak but still much higher than his rating 13 months earlier.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dalton, R. J. (2004) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268436.001.0001 · Cited by 1,372
Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America
Davis, D. W., & Silver, B. D. (2004) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00054.x · Cited by 722
The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?
Bol, D., Giani, M., Blais, A., & Loewen, P. J. (2021) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12401 · Cited by 701
The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach
GARTNER, S. S. (2008) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055408080027 · Cited by 425
Political trust during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Rally around the flag or lockdown effects?
Schraff, D. (2021) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12425 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Hetherington, M. J., & Nelson, M.
- Venue
- Political Science and Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 37-42
- ISSN
- 0030-8269 (ISSN-L)
- 1049-0965
- 1537-5935
- OpenAlex
- W2124378400
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 69.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anatomy of a Rally Effect: George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1049096503001665
- The paper
- Hetherington, M. J., & Nelson, M. (2003). Anatomy of a Rally Effect: George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism. Political Science and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096503001665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.