The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Political trust during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Rally around the flag or lockdown effects?
Open accessAbstract
How can we explain the rise in diffuse political support during the Covid‐19 pandemic? Recent research has argued that the lockdown measures generated political support. In contrast, I argue that the intensity of the pandemic rallied people around political institutions. Collective angst in the face of exponentially rising Covid‐19 cases depresses the usual cognitive evaluations of institutions and leads citizens to rally around existing intuitions as a lifebuoy. Using a representative Dutch household survey conducted over March 2020, I compare the lockdown effect to the dynamic of the pandemic. I find that the lockdown effect is driven by pre‐existing time trends. Accounting for non‐linearities in time makes the lockdown effect disappear. In contrast, more flexible modelling techniques reveal a robust effect of Covid‐19 infections on political trust. In line with an anxiety effect, I find that standard determinants of political trust – such as economic evaluations and social trust – lose explanatory power as the pandemic spreads. This speaks to an emotionally driven rally effect that pushes cognitive evaluations to the background.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A re-assessment of the concept of political support.
Easton, D. (1975) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123400008309 · Cited by 3,088
The effect of COVID‐19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?
Bol, D., Giani, M., Blais, A., & Loewen, P. J. (2021) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12401 · Cited by 701
A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs: Foundations
Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N., & Titiunik, R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108684606 · Cited by 545
Hainmueller, J., & Hazlett, C. (2014) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpt019 · Cited by 517
The Emotional Underpinnings of Populism: How Anger and Fear Affect Populist Attitudes
Rico, G., Guinjoan, M., & Anduiza, E. (2017) · Swiss Political Science Review · doi:10.1111/spsr.12261 · Cited by 465
Anatomy of a Rally Effect: George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism
Hetherington, M. J., & Nelson, M. (2003) · Political Science and Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096503001665 · Cited by 446
Esaiasson, P., Sohlberg, J., Ghersetti, M., & Johansson, B. (2021) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12419 · Cited by 342
Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government
Foster, C., & Frieden, J. (2017) · European Union Politics · doi:10.1177/1465116517723499 · Cited by 332
Unexpected Event during Survey Design: Promise and Pitfalls for Causal Inference
Muñoz, J., Falcó-Gimeno, A., & Hernández, E. (2020) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2019.27 · Cited by 329
Political trust : why context matters
Zmerli, S., & Hooghe, M. (2013) · Cited by 290
Cited by
Ares, M., Bürgisser, R., & Häusermann, S. (2021) · Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2021.1924736 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Schraff, D.
- Venue
- European Journal of Political Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1007-1017
- ISSN
- 0304-4130 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6765
- OpenAlex
- W3102758797
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 189.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political trust during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Rally around the flag or lockdown effects? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1475-6765.12425
- The paper
- Schraff, D. (2021). Political trust during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Rally around the flag or lockdown effects? European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.