Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,015

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling

Tansey, Oisín·2007·PS: Political Science & Politics

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between the method of process tracing and the data collection technique of elite interviewing. The process tracing method has become an increasingly used and cited tool in qualitative research, a trend that has recently accelerated with the publication of Alexander George and Andrew Bennett's text (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. That book outlines and explores the process tracing method in detail, highlighting its advantages for exploring causal processes and analyzing complex decision-making. Yet while the book presents a rigorous and compelling account of the process tracing method and its critical importance to case study research, the value of the method itself remains contested in some quarters, and there are aspects of George and Bennett's treatment of it that require further exploration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1049096507071211

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Aberbach, Joel D. , and Bert A. Rockman . 2000. In the Web of Politics: Three Decades of the U.S. Federal Executive. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Press.
  2. 10.1086/267988 · doi:10.1086/267988
  3. Henry, Gary T. 1990. Practical Sampling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  4. 10.2307/2538987 · doi:10.2307/2538987
  5. 10.1111/1467-9256.00138 · doi:10.1111/1467-9256.00138
  6. George, Alexander L. , and Timothy J. McKeown . 1985. “Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making.” In Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, eds. Robert Coulam and Richard Smith . Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 21–58.

Cited by

See all 1,015

Metadata

Authors
Tansey, O.
Venue
PS: Political Science & Politics
Published
2007-10
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
765-772
ISSN
  • 0030-8269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1049-0965
  • 1537-5935
OpenAlex
W2118952010
Cited by
1,015
References
21
FWCI
30.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1049096507071211
The paper
Tansey, O. (2007). Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling. PS: Political Science & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096507071211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.