The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research Methods in Social Relations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?
Nulty, D. D. (2008) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930701293231 · Cited by 2,581
HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known
Kerr, N. L. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 · Cited by 1,989
Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling
Tansey, O. (2007) · PS: Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096507071211 · Cited by 1,015
Chau, P. Y. K. (1997) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01313.x · Cited by 854
Building knowledge through families of experiments
Basili, V. R., Shull, F., & Lanubile, F. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.799939 · Cited by 852
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-98
- ISSN
- 0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3216404766
- Cited by
- 2,081
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 220.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research Methods in Social Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80303-2
- The paper
- Research Methods in Social Relations. (1992). Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80303-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
