The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Unsettling Lessons: Teaching Indigenous Politics and Settler Colonialism in Political Science
Open accessAbstract
Indigenous politics and history are central to and, indeed, intertwined with the history and politics of many if not most contemporary nations, yet the topics of indigenous politics and settler colonialism are rarely taught in undergraduate political science programs. This article outlines the pedagogical utility of an undergraduate course focused on indigenous history and politics, approached through a comparative race politics framework. The course on which this article is based compares state power and indigenous rights in the United States, Australia, and Latin America in historical context, but many variations are possible. The article first reviews the context for developing the course, the challenges related to teaching the subject, and my primary teaching objectives. It then outlines three pedagogical strategies applicable in other course frameworks and discusses positive learning outcomes I have observed as I refine this teaching area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The woman-led grassroots social movements at issue highlight a fundamental lack of awareness towards the historical and current struggles of Indigenous Peoples, both in the US and in Canada.
“First of all, the woman-led grassroots social movements at issue highlight a fundamental lack of awareness towards the historical and current struggles of Indigenous Peoples, both in the US and in Canada.”
From Sacred Sites Protection and Indigenous Women’s Activism: Empowering Grassroots Social Movements to Influence Public Policy. A Look into the “Women of Standing Rock” and “Idle No More” Indigenous Movements (2020) · cites this paper as Wadsworth 2014
The paper’s Abstract (page unavailable) says that neglect of Indigenous politics perpetuates illiteracy about Indigenous peoples’ histories and ongoing political struggles, particularly in US political science education. The Comparative Struggles section mentions women’s roles in Canadian Idle No More activism, but does not establish that woman-led movements highlight a fundamental lack of awareness in both the US and Canada. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere is a sheer lack of teaching in Indigenous politics and history in the realm of political science.
“As Nancy Wadsworth highlighted in her work, there is a sheer lack of teaching in Indigenous politics and history in the realm of political science (Wadsworth 2014).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Sheehy, 2013, Graduation Rates Dropping Among Native American Students, US News and World Report
- Yashar, 2005, Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge, 10.1017/CBO9780511790966 · DOI
- Belgarde, 2003, The Retention/Intervention Study of Native American Undergraduates at the University of New Mexico, Journal of College Student Retention, 5, 175, 10.2190/ML98-8WQF-EFWP-7MCY · DOI
- Ford, 2010, Settler Sovereignty: Jurisdiction and Indigenous People in America and Australia, 1788–1836, 10.2307/j.ctv1smjszh · DOI
- Peck, 1998, Bones of Contention
- Bruyneel, Kevin . Forthcoming. “Political Science and the Study of Indigenous Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook on Social Science and the Study of Indigenous Peoples’ Politics, ed. Turner, Dale and Lucero, Tony . New York: Oxford University Press.
- Lawrence, 2005, Decolonizing Antiracism, Social Justice, 32, 120
- Pateman, 2007, Contract and Domination
- Cavanaugh, 2013, Editors Statement, Settler Colonial Studies, 3, 1, 10.1080/18380743.2013.768169 · DOI
- Smith, 2004, The Puzzling Place of Race in American Political Science, PS: Political Science and Politics, 37, 41
- Smith, 2007, Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
- Fredrickson, 2002, Racism: A Short History
- McClain, 1993, Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, 247
- Bruyneel, 2007, The Third Space of Sovereignty: The Postcolonial Politics of U.S.–Indigenous Relations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Wadsworth, N. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wadsworth, Nancy D.
- ORCID
- Wadsworth, Nancy D.
- Venue
- Political Science and Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-06-19
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 692-697
- ISSN
- 0030-8269 (ISSN-L)
- 1049-0965
- 1537-5935
- OpenAlex
- W2321565554
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- PS Political Science & Politics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
- Keywords
- indigenous politics, settler colonialism, indigenous rights, teaching methods, state power, United States, Australia, Latin America
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review