The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science
Open accessAbstract
This article explores publication patterns across 10 prominent political science journals, documenting a significant gender gap in publication rates for men and women. We present three broad findings. First, we find no evidence that the low percentage of female authors simply mirrors an overall low share of women in the profession. Instead, we find continued underrepresentation of women in many of the discipline’s top journals. Second, we find that women are not benefiting equally in a broad trend across the discipline toward coauthorship. Most published collaborative research in these journals emerges from all-male teams. Third, it appears that the methodological proclivities of the top journals do not fully reflect the kind of work that female scholars are more likely than men to publish in these journals. The underrepresentation of qualitative work in many journals is associated as well with an underrepresentation of female authors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nepotism and sexism in peer-review
Wennerås, C., & Wold, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387341a0 · Cited by 1,345
Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley.
Jenkins, J. C., & Gaventa, J. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2067130 · Cited by 1,215
What's in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching
MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4 · Cited by 762
The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations
Maliniak, D., Powers, R., & Walter, B. F. (2013) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818313000209 · Cited by 718
The “majority illusion” in social networks
Lerman, K., Yan, X., & Wu, X.-Z. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147617 · Cited by 669
Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis
(2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316273104 · Cited by 576
Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty
TRIX, F., & PSENKA, C. (2003) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926503014002277 · Cited by 553
The silent sex: gender, deliberation, and institutions
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.187132 · Cited by 292
Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder
Handley, I. M., Brown, E. R., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Smith, J. L. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510649112 · Cited by 240
Pierson, P. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316273104.006 · Cited by 148
Cited by
Dondio, P., Casnici, N., Grimaldo, F., Gilbert, N., & Squazzoni, F. (2019) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.018 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Teele, D. L., & Thelen, K.
- Venue
- Political Science and Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-03-31
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 433-447
- ISSN
- 0030-8269 (ISSN-L)
- 1049-0965
- 1537-5935
- OpenAlex
- W2600156845
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 140.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1049096516002985
- The paper
- Teele, D. L., & Thelen, K. (2017). Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science. Political Science and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096516002985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.