Trial-based psychotherapy and the efficacy of trial-based thought record in changing unhelpful core beliefs and reducing self-criticism
Abstract
Introduction: The best prevention against relapse results when patients are taught to restructure negative core beliefs (CBs). Efficacy of the trial-based thought record (TBTR) in decreasing the credit given by patients to negative CBs and corresponding emotions was evaluated. Method: Patients (n = 166) were submitted to a simulation of a legal trial to assess their adherence to negative CBs and corresponding emotions after each cognitive therapy technique incorporated by TBTR. Results: Significant reductions existed in percent values after the first and second defense attorney pleas, as well as after jury's verdict and initial preparation for the appeal (p < 0.001), relative to the investigation phase. Significant differences also emerged between the defense attorney's first and second pleas and between the defense attorney's second plea and jury's verdict, as well as preparation for the appeal (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between percentages presented by patients submitted to TBTR used in the empty chair format relative to the conventional format. Similarly, there was no difference between outcomes, regardless of therapists’ level of exposure to TBTR. Conclusion: TBTR may help patients reduce attachment to negative CBs and corresponding emotions. Outcomes were significantly favorable regardless of the format use and therapists’ level of exposure to TBTR.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a replication with 166 patients with varying diagnoses and comorbidities, TBCT showed a significant reduction in attachment to dysfunctional CBs and emotional intensity.
“In a replication of this study, de Oliveira et al. (2012a, b) evaluated the effect of the intervention in 166 patients with varying diagnoses as well as varying comorbidities.Results from this study showed a significant reduction in the attachment to dysfunctional CBs and in emotional intensity.”
From Trial-Based Cognitive Therapy: Efficacy of a New CBT Approach for Treating Social Anxiety Disorder with Comorbid Depression. (2018) · cites this paper as de Oliveira et al. (2012a, b)
When comparing therapists with different levels of experience, there were no differences in treatment outcome.
“When comparing therapists with different levels of experience, there were no differences in treatment outcome, indicating that the treatment may be a helpful tool even for clinicians that are relatively unfamiliar with it.”
From Trial-Based Cognitive Therapy: Efficacy of a New CBT Approach for Treating Social Anxiety Disorder with Comorbid Depression. (2018) · cites this paper as de Oliveira et al. (2012a, b)
Studies show that The Trial technique is effective in reducing attachment to dysfunctional core beliefs and associated emotional intensity, as well as social anxiety symptoms.
“Studies that evaluated the effect of The Trial technique in various psychiatric disorders (de Oliveira 2008;de Oliveira et al. 2012a, b;Delavechia et al. 2016), and also in generalized SAD (de Oliveira et al. 2012b;Powell et al. 2013) show that this technique is effective in reducing the attachment to dysfunctional CBs and the associated emotional intensity, as well as social anxiety symptoms.”
From Trial-Based Cognitive Therapy: Efficacy of a New CBT Approach for Treating Social Anxiety Disorder with Comorbid Depression. (2018) · cites this paper as de Oliveira et al. 2012a
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Powell, V. B., Oliveira, O. H. D., Seixas, C., Almeida, C., Grangeon, M. C., Caldas, M., Bonfim, T. D., Castro, M., Almeida, A. G.-D., Moraes, R. D. O., et al. (2013) · Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2012-0863 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationChanging negative core beliefs with trial-based thought record
Delavechia, T. R., Velasquez, M. L., Duran, É. P., Matsumoto, L. S., & Oliveira, I. R. D. (2016) · Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo) · doi:10.1590/0101-60830000000078 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationCaetano, K. A. S., Depreeuw, B., Papenfuss, I., Curtiss, J., Langwerden, R. J., Hofmann, S. G., & Neufeld, C. B. (2018) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1007/s41811-018-0028-7 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Oliveira, I. R., Hemmany, C., Powell, V. B., Bonfim, T. D., Duran, É. P., Novais, N., Velasquez, M., Di Sarno, E., Alves, G. L., & Cesnik, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR)
- Venue
- CNS Spectrums
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-04-26
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-23
- ISSN
- 1092-8529 (ISSN-L)
- 2165-6509
- OpenAlex
- W2052437123
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CNS Spectrums (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cognitive therapy, negative core beliefs, self-criticism, empty chair technique, relapse prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Culture, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Self-Assessment, Thinking, Treatment Outcome, Statistics, Nonparametric, Observation, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review