The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attitudes Towards Computerized CBT for Depression Amongst a Student Population
Abstract
Some studies of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy (CCBT) have found evidence of its effectiveness, yet a number have reported low uptake and/or completion rates. This study investigated attitudes towards CCBT for depression amongst 122 university students. The credibility of CCBT, expectancy-for-improvement and perceived likelihood of using it were all poor, although a minority (9.8%) stated a preference for CCBT over other interventions. When 20 of the original sample received a demonstration of a CCBT programme for depression, significant increases in credibility, expectancy-for-improvement and in perceived likelihood of using CCBT were found. Numbers stating a preference for CCBT increased to 30%. At both stages, most students stated a preference for CCBT to be accompanied by counselling. Qualitative analysis provided information about factors that might influence these attitudes. Implications for service delivery are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies generally find that these acceptability-facilitating interventions improve acceptability and intention to use digital mental health programs (23, 24, 29, 30) but not all (31).”
From Improving Acceptability and Uptake Behavior for Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“Therapist-assisted iCBT programs are generally rated as more acceptable than self-guided programs (23, 24)”
From Improving Acceptability and Uptake Behavior for Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“Mitchell and Gordon [30] found that participants’ ratings of computerised CBT improved after demonstration of the trial”
From A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis (2019) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,269
(1998) · Cited by 13,501
Cognitive Therapy for Depression
(2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e675542012-001 · Cited by 9,678
Cognitive Therapy of Depression
HOLLON, S. D., & BECK, A. T. (1979) · Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404480-7.50012-5 · Cited by 4,685
Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed.
Field, A. P. (2005) · Cited by 2,558
Borkovec, T. D., & Costello, E. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.4.611 · Cited by 756
National Service Framework for Mental Health
Thornicroft, G. (2000) · Psychiatric Bulletin · doi:10.1192/pb.24.6.203 · Cited by 639
Borkovec, T. D., Newman, M. G., Pincus, A. L., & Lytle, R. (2002) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.70.2.288 · Cited by 565
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (NICE)
Taylor, R. S. (2002) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s026646230200017x · Cited by 412
PROUDFOOT, J., GOLDBERG, D., MANN, A., EVERITT, B., MARKS, I., & GRAY, J. A. (2003) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291702007225 · Cited by 389
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hollis, C., Falconer, C. J., Martin, J. L., Whittington, C., Stockton, S., Glazebrook, C., & Davies, E. B. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12663 · Cited by 846
Davies, E. B., Morriss, R., & Glazebrook, C. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3142 · Cited by 499
Ebert, D. D., Berking, M., Cuijpers, P., Lehr, D., Pörtner, M., & Baumeister, H. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.01.056 · Cited by 268
Attitudes towards digital treatment for depression: A European stakeholder survey
Topooco, N., Riper, H., Araya, R., Berking, M., Brunn, M., Chevreul, K., Cieslak, R., Ebert, D. D., Etchmendy, E., Herrero, R., et al. (2017) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2017.01.001 · Cited by 262
Philippi, P., Baumeister, H., Apolinário-Hagen, J., Ebert, D. D., Hennemann, S., Kott, L., Lin, J., Messner, E.-M., & Terhorst, Y. (2021) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100459 · Cited by 200
“This lack of acceptance might explain the overall low uptake and adherence rates (Kar-yotaki et al., 2017; Lillevoll et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2018; Mitchell and Gordon, 2007).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, N., & Gordon, P. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Venue
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-05-14
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-430
- ISSN
- 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1833
- OpenAlex
- W2018751296
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- depression, university students, credibility, service delivery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
