Cited by 15Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychological flexibility as a potential change factor in cognitive behavioural therapy of OCD

Open access
Schubert, Christiane, Hilbert, Sven, Favreau, Matthias, Wolstein, Jörg, Voderholzer, Ulrich·2022·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

Background: To gain a better understanding about which aspects of the treatment work for obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD), the investigation of possible change factors is essential. Psychological flexibility (PsyF) has been of interest in research on successful OCD therapy for some time. Exposure interventions and cognitive strategies in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for OCD may enhance PsyF. To date, however, no process studies have been published that clarify the role of PsyF as a possible change factor for the reduction of OCD symptoms. Aims: This study investigates whether PsyF works as a mediator in successful CBT treatment of OCD. Method: The study recruited 112 adults diagnosed with OCD in a multi-modal in-patient treatment with specific CBT including exposure and response prevention (ERP). The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) was used to measure OCD symptoms and three self-constructed items to assess PsyF. PsyF was conceptualised as the capability of patients to accept stressful feelings and thoughts. Data were collected weekly. For statistical analysis at the process level, longitudinal multi-level models (MLMs) with random intercepts and linear growth curves were estimated to test for mediation of PsyF on Y-BOCS. Results: OCD symptoms decreased significantly and PsyF increased in patients throughout the course of therapy. MLM revealed that higher average values in PsyF were associated with lower Y-BOCS sum values, but only values between subjects significantly predicted the degree of obsessions and compulsions. Conclusions: Although research shows that PsyF is enhanced by CBT and also shows a connection with Y-BOCS values, its role as a mediator could not be confirmed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465822000091

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 51 · Cited by 15

Authors
Schubert, C., Hilbert, S., Favreau, M., Wolstein, J., & Voderholzer, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Bamberg (DE)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
  • University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Schubert, Christiane
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2022-03-04
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
381-391
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W4220792497
Cited by
15
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychological flexibility, obsessive-compulsive disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, exposure and response prevention, mediation, obsessions and compulsions, in-patient treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Compulsive Personality Disorder, Humans, Obsessive Behavior, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review