CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 261Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mood and global-local visual processing

Basso, Michael R., Schefft, Bruce K., Ris, M. Douglas, Dember, William N.·1996·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
DOI 10.1017/s1355617700001193
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Testing hypotheses derived from neuropsychological models of mood, as well as the association of mood states and personality characteristics with global-local visual processing, were examined. Fifty-nine men completed measures associated with depression and positive mood, and were administered a brief perceptual judgment task that assessed global-local visual processing biases. Additionally, 19 of these 59 subjects were administered measures of anxiety and optimism-pessimism and completed an expanded judgment task. Affective and personality variables were then correlated with judgment task performances. Consistent with predictions, positive mood and optimism were directly associated with a global bias and inversely related to a local bias. A converse pattern of findings was obtained with depression and trait anxiety. Implications for research concerning other aspects of visual processing are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617700001193

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Brown, 1995, Brain asymmetry, 77
  3. Shapiro, 1965, Neurotic styles
  4. Kohler, 1929, Gestalt psychology
  5. Bruder, 1995, Brain asymmetry, 661
  6. Costa, 1985, The NEO personality inventory manual

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–261 of 261

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Basso, M. R., Schefft, B. K., Ris, M. D., & Dember, W. N.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1996-05
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
249-255
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
DOI
10.1017/s1355617700001193
OpenAlex
W1990552217
Cited by
261
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 4684 d)
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mood, positive mood, depression, trait anxiety, optimism, pessimism, perceptual judgment, personality
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Attention, Depression, Dominance, Cerebral, Euphoria, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Personality, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review