The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Syntactic language processing: ERP lesion data on the role of the basal ganglia
Open accessAbstract
The role of the basal ganglia in syntactic language processing was investigated with event-related brain potentials in fourteen neurologically impaired patients. Seven of these patients had basal ganglia lesions while 7 other patients primarily had lesions of the left temporo–parietal region excluding the basal ganglia. All patients listened to sentences that were either correct or included a verb argument structure violation. In previous experiments this type of violation elicited a biphasic pattern of an N400–P600 complex in young healthy participants. While the N400 may result from incorrect semantic-thematic role assignment, the P600 reflects the fact that verb information does not license the syntactic structure at present. Results of the patient experiment revealed a double dissociation: patients with left temporo–parietal lesions only show a P600, whereas patients with lesions of the basal ganglia showed no P600, but a negativity with extended duration that resembled an N400. The latter pattern not only confirms previous reports that the basal ganglia modulate the P600 but extends these results by showing that the N400 as a late semantic–thematic integration process appears partially modulated by the basal ganglia. (JINS, 2003, 9, 1053–1060.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing
Friederici, A. D. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01839-8 · Cited by 2,231
Self-citationWhy the P600 is not just a P300: The role of the basal ganglia
Frisch, S., Kotz, S. A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2003) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00366-8 · Cited by 162
Self-citation
Cited by
Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax
Kuperberg, G. R. (2007) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063 · Cited by 1,041
Kotz, S. A., Schwartze, M., & Schmidt-Kassow, M. (2009) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.02.010 · Cited by 297
Self-citationHierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca's area
Bahlmann, J., Schubotz, R. I., & Friederici, A. D. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.249 · Cited by 293
Self-citationReyes, P., Ortega-Merchan, M. P., Rueda, A., Uriza, F., Santamaria-García, H., Rojas-Serrano, N., Rodriguez-Santos, J., Velasco-Leon, M. C., Rodriguez-Parra, J. D., Mora-Diaz, D. E., et al. (2018) · Behavioural Neurology · doi:10.1155/2018/9684129 · Cited by 52
Striatum and language processing: Where do we stand?
Jacquemot, C., & Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104785 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- KOTZ, S. A., FRISCH, S., VON CRAMON, D. Y., & FRIEDERICI, A. D.
- Venue
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1053-1060
- ISSN
- 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7661
- OpenAlex
- W2096946161
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Syntactic language processing: ERP lesion data on the role of the basal ganglia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1355617703970093
- The paper
- KOTZ, S. A., FRISCH, S., VON CRAMON, D. Y., & FRIEDERICI, A. D. (2003). Syntactic language processing: ERP lesion data on the role of the basal ganglia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617703970093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.