Cited by 162Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeuroscience and Music PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Why the P600 is not just a P300: The role of the basal ganglia

Open access
Frisch, Stefan, Kotz, Sonja A, von Cramon, D.Yves, Friederici, Angela D·2003·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

One of the important issues in event-related brain potential research is whether the language-related P600 and the P300 oddball effect are distinct components or not. We addressed this question by testing 14 aphasic patients, half of them with lesions including the basal ganglia and half of them with temporo-parietal lesions, in both an auditory oddball task and an experiment with auditory presented verb inflection violations. Whereas both patient groups displayed a clear P300 effect in the oddball experiment, only the group with temporo-parietal lesions showed a P600 in the language experiment. These data indicate that the basal ganglia seem to play a crucial role in the modulation of the P600, but not of the P300 component.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00366-8

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Friederici AD, Kotz SA, Werheid K, Hein G, von Cramon DY. Selective vulnerability of early and late syntactic processes in Parkinson patients: ERP evidence. Brain Lang 2001;79:15-16.
  2. Osterhout L, Holcomb PJ. Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly. J Mem Lang 1992;31:785-804.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frisch, S., Kotz, S. A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Frisch, Stefan
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
336-340
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146472529
Cited by
162
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
P600, P300, event-related potentials, basal ganglia, aphasia, auditory oddball paradigm, language processing, neuropsychological patients
MeSH terms
Aphasia, Basal Ganglia, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Parietal Lobe, Speech Perception, Temporal Lobe, Event-Related Potentials, P300

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review