Cited by 42Translation Studies and PracticesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

An interdisciplinary approach to neuropsychological test construction: Perspectives from translation studies

BENDER, H. ALLISON, MARTÍN GARCÍA, ADOLFO, BARR, WILLIAM B.·2010·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Few neuropsychological tests have been developed specifically for non-English speakers. Rather, assessment measures are often derived from English source texts (STs) and translated into foreign language target texts (TTs). An abundant literature describes the potential for translation error occurring in test construction. While the neuropsychology community has striven to correct these inadequacies, interdisciplinary approaches to test translation have been largely ignored. Translation studies, which has roots in linguistics, semiotics, computer science, anthropology, and philosophy, may provide a much-needed framework for test development. We aim to apply specific aspects of Descriptive Translation Studies to present unique and heretofore unapplied frameworks to the socio-cultural conceptualizations of translated tests. In doing so, a more theoretical basis for test construction will be explored. To this end, translation theory can provide valuable insights toward the development of linguistically and culturally relevant neuropsychological test measures suitable for an increasingly diverse patient base.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617709991378

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tests may present low construct validity if based on direct translations or validated only via back-translations.

    “In particular, tests may present low construct validity if based on direct translations or validated only via back-translations. 121”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BENDER, H. A., MARTÍN GARCÍA, A., & BARR, W. B.
Affiliations
NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
BENDER, H. ALLISON
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2010-01-29
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
227-232
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2038655093
Cited by
42
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy
  • University of Cambridge
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • U.S. Public Health Service (1F32H016819)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
test translation, translation studies, descriptive translation studies, translation errors, non-English speakers, cross-cultural assessment, culturally responsive assessment, test development
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Humans, Linguistics, Neuropsychological Tests, Neuropsychology, Psychological Theory, Semantics, Severity of Illness Index, Cultural Diversity, Interdisciplinary Communication, Emigrants and Immigrants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review