The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability and the measurement of wealth
Open accessAbstract
We develop and apply a consistent and comprehensive theoretical framework for assessing whether economic growth is compatible with sustaining wellbeing over time. Our approach differs from earlier approaches by concentrating on wealth rather than income. Sustainability is demonstrated by showing that a properly defined comprehensive measure of wealth is maintained through time. Our wealth measure is unusually comprehensive, capturing not only reproducible and human capital but also natural capital, health improvements and technological change. We apply the framework to five countries: the United States, China, Brazil, India and Venezuela. We show that the often-neglected contributors to wealth – technological change, natural capital and health capital – fundamentally affect the conclusions one draws about whether given nations are achieving sustainability. Indeed, even countries that display sustainability differ considerably in the kinds of capital that contribute to it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
(2020) · doi:10.4060/ca9825en · Cited by 3,408
The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world
Viscusi, W. K., & Aldy, J. E. (2003) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1023/a:1025598106257 · Cited by 2,135
Cited by
A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation
Li, L., Chu, W., Langford, J., & Schapire, R. E. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772758 · Cited by 2,562
Dynamics of global forest area: Results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015
Keenan, R. J., Reams, G. A., Achard, F., de Freitas, J. V., Grainger, A., & Lindquist, E. (2015) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.014 · Cited by 1,656
Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation
Jamison, D. T., Summers, L. H., Alleyne, G., Arrow, K. J., Berkley, S., Binagwaho, A., Bustreo, F., Evans, D., Feachem, R. G. A., Frenk, J., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62105-4 · Cited by 1,220
Self-citationNational baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards
Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Teksoz, K., Durand-Delacre, D., & Sachs, J. D. (2017) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2985 · Cited by 616
The Sustainable Development Goals and the systems approach to sustainability
Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C. (2017) · Economics · doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2017-28 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Arrow, K. J., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L. H., Mumford, K. J., & Oleson, K.
- Venue
- Environment and Development Economics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-05-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-353
- ISSN
- 1355-770X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4395
- OpenAlex
- W2892282484
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 163.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1355770x12000137
- The paper
- Arrow, K. J., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L. H., Mumford, K. J., & Oleson, K. (2012). Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environment and Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x12000137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.