The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship between internucleotide linkage geometry and the stability of RNA
Open accessAbstract
The inherent chemical instability of RNA under physiological conditions is primarily due to the spontaneous cleavage of phosphodiester linkages via intramolecular transesterification reactions. Although the protonation state of the nucleophilic 2'-hydroxyl group is a critical determinant of the rate of RNA cleavage, the precise geometry of the chemical groups that comprise each internucleotide linkage also has a significant impact on cleavage activity. Specifically, transesterification is expected to be proportional to the relative in-line character of the linkage. We have examined the rates of spontaneous cleavage of various RNAs for which the secondary and tertiary structures have previously been modeled using either NMR or X-ray crystallographic data. Rate constants determined for the spontaneous cleavage of different RNA linkages vary by almost 10,000-fold, most likely reflecting the contribution that secondary and tertiary structures make towards the overall chemical stability of RNA. Moreover, a correlation is observed between RNA cleavage rate and the relative in-line fitness of each internucleotide linkage. One linkage located within an ATP-binding RNA aptamer is predicted to adopt most closely the ideal conformation for in-line attack. This linkage has a rate constant for transesterification that is approximately 12-fold greater than is observed for an unconstrained linkage and was found to be the most labile among a total of 136 different sites examined. The implications of this relationship for the chemical stability of RNA and for the mechanisms of nucleases and ribozymes are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li, Y., & Breaker, R. R. (1999) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja990592p · Cited by 587
Self-citationOivanen, M., Kuusela, S., & Lönnberg, H. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960425x · Cited by 438
Cited by
Adenine riboswitches and gene activation by disruption of a transcription terminator
Mandal, M., & Breaker, R. R. (2004) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb710 · Cited by 514
Self-citationWidespread genetic switches and toxicity resistance proteins for fluoride
Baker, J. L., Sudarsan, N., Weinberg, Z., Roth, A., Stockbridge, R. B., & Breaker, R. R. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215063 · Cited by 438
Self-citationStructure and Mechanism of a Metal-Sensing Regulatory RNA
Dann, C. E., Wakeman, C. A., Sieling, C. L., Baker, S. C., Irnov, I., & Winkler, W. C. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.051 · Cited by 386
An mRNA structure in bacteria that controls gene expression by binding lysine
Sudarsan, N., Wickiser, J. K., Nakamura, S., Ebert, M. S., & Breaker, R. R. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1140003 · Cited by 357
Self-citationWeinberg, Z., Wang, J. X., Bogue, J., Yang, J., Corbino, K., Moy, R. H., & Breaker, R. R. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r31 · Cited by 354
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- SOUKUP, G. A., & BREAKER, R. R.
- Venue
- RNA
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1308-1325
- ISSN
- 1355-8382 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153461732
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between internucleotide linkage geometry and the stability of RNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1355838299990891
- The paper
- SOUKUP, G. A., & BREAKER, R. R. (1999). Relationship between internucleotide linkage geometry and the stability of RNA. RNA. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355838299990891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.