Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socially meaningful syntactic variation in sign-based grammar

BENDER, EMILY M.·2007·English Language and Linguistics

Abstract

In this article, I investigate the implications of socially meaningful sociolinguistic variation for competence grammar, working from the point of view of HPSG as a kind of performance-plausible sign-based grammar. Taking data from African American Vernacular English variable copula absence as a case study, I argue that syntactic constraints and social meaning are intertwined. I present an overview of the literature on social meaning, discuss what grammars are models of, and argue that in order to model socially meaningful variation, competence grammars need to be extended to include social meaning, precompiled phrases, and probabilistic or frequentistic information. I then explore different heuristics for defining the boundaries of competence grammar and discuss the commonalities between the proposed additions and the kind of linguistic knowledge which is generally assumed to comprise competence grammar.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1360674307002286

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
BENDER, E. M.
Venue
English Language and Linguistics
Published
2007-07
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
347-381
ISSN
  • 1360-6743
  • 1469-4379
Cited by
9
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Socially meaningful syntactic variation in sign-based grammar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1360674307002286
The paper
BENDER, E. M. (2007). Socially meaningful syntactic variation in sign-based grammar. English Language and Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674307002286