Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese–English bilingual child
Abstract
Research on early bilingual development has suggested that syntactic transfer in bilingual acquisition is dependent on patterns of dominance and properties of the dual input the child is exposed to. In a case study of a Hong Kong bilingual child we present evidence of transfer from Cantonese to English in three areas where the two languages contrast typologically: wh-in-situ interrogatives, null objects and prenominal relatives are observed at a period when Cantonese is dominant as measured by MLUw. Comparisons with monolingual development show both qualitative and quantitative differences attributable to transfer. Language dominance is seen as the major determinant of transfer, with input ambiguity playing a role in the domain of null objects. While two distinct and separate linguistic systems are simultaneously developing in the bilingual mind, the pervasiveness of transfer implies a high degree of interaction between them. The findings show that the bilingual subject in our case study has taken a different path from monolinguals toward the target.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bilingual children whose L1 is morphologically rich (e.g., Spanish) are likely to have higher accuracy in L2 morpheme production than bilingual children whose L1 is morphologically isolating (e.g., Mandarin).
“Studies have shown that, bilingual children whose L1 is morphologically rich such as Spanish are likely to have a higher accuracy in morpheme production than bilingual children whose L1 is a morphologically isolating language such as Mandarin.”
From The roles of L1 transfer, L2 exposure, and morphological salience in bilingual children's L2 English morphological development (2025) · cites this paper as Yip and Matthews, 2000
Cites
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y.-H. (1997) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1191/026765897671476153 · Cited by 824 · cited 13× · see citing works
“According to one analysis (proposed for Mandarin Chinese which Hawkins and Chan (1997) attribute to Huang (1980; 1995)), the gap in the relative clause is bound by a null topic, much as in the case of null objects outlined above: I know those CL people ‘‘The people I know’’ Assuming such a…”
Influential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The language and literacy development of young dual language learners: A critical review
Hammer, C. S., Hoff, E., Uchikoshi, Y., Gillanders, C., Castro, D. C., & Sandilos, L. E. (2014) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.05.008 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism
HERNANDEZ, A., LI, P., & MACWHINNEY, B. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.003 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Examining language and early numeracy skills in young Latino dual language learners
Méndez, L. I., Hammer, C. S., Lopez, L. M., & Blair, C. (2019) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.02.004 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Wang, X., McMillen, S., & Shi, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1566442 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yip, V., & Matthews, S.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Venue
- Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-208
- ISSN
- 1366-7289 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1841
- OpenAlex
- W2130406508
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bilingualism Language and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Keywords
- syntactic transfer, Cantonese-English bilingualism, language dominance, null subjects, language transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review