Cited by 13Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsDietetics, Nutrition, and EducationNutrition, Health, and Society Studies

How cooks navigate nutrition, hunger and care in public-sector foodservice settings

Open access
Tsui, Emma K, Morillo, Arelis·2016·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: To examine the perspectives and practices of cooks responsible for carrying out healthy meal programmes in publicly funded foodservice, in order to better understand what they consider to be ‘good’ food and where nutrition and nutritional standards fit into this conceptualization. Design: A qualitative, exploratory study involving in-depth interviews that were conducted with cooks and their supervisors about their work practices and perspectives on providing healthy food for clients. Setting: Participants were recruited from child-care, after-school, senior-centre and shelter settings that had participated in healthy menu training in New York City, USA. Subjects: Eighteen cooks and nine supervisors working in the aforementioned settings. Results: The views and practices of both cooks and supervisors about what constitutes ‘good’ food extend beyond a purely nutritional view of goodness to include the importance of addressing hunger and clients’ food preferences, among other factors. Cooks address these by interacting with clients and altering recipes and menus in a range of ways to maximize the likelihood of food consumption and enjoyment. These approaches are often, but not always, compatible with setting-specific nutritional guidelines that may be set at the national, state, local or organizational level. Conclusions: Cooks play a key role in translating nutritional guidelines into what is served. In doing so, they engage in skilled labour and forms of care that increase the ability of public-sector foodservice to address food security and other goals, but these aspects of their work are not widely recognized.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980015002086

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • En janvier 2021, 2 714 restaurants collectifs sont labellisés « En cuisine », soit une hausse de plus de 100 % en 2 ans.

    “En janvier 2021, 2 714 le sont soit une hausse de plus de 100 % en 2 ans39”

    From La transition agroécologique de la restauration collective en France : une mise en perspective multi-niveaux (2022) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Methods section describes interviews with cooks at New York City foodservice sites, not French restaurants holding the « En cuisine » label. Searches for the label, the January 2021 count of 2,714, and the claimed two-year increase found no passage addressing those figures. The paper was published in 2016 and does not report a January 2021 count. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Institute of Medicine (2011) Child and Adult Care Food Program: Aligning Dietary Guidance for All. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  2. World Health Organization (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review: What Does It Take to Scale Up Nutrition Action? Geneva: WHO.
  3. Mol A, Moser I & Pols J (2010) Care: putting practice into theory. In Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, pp. 7-26 [

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsui, E. K., & Morillo, A.
Affiliations
Lehman College (US)
Corresponding author
Tsui, Emma K
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2015-07-02
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
946-954
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W1951265392
Cited by
13
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
City University of New York
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Keywords
cooks, nutritional standards, hunger, food preferences, food security, care work, skilled workers, menu adaptation
MeSH terms
Whole Grains, Diet, Healthy, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cooking, Dietary Proteins, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Food Preferences, Food Services, Fruit, Humans, Hunger, Institutional Management Teams, Male, Menu Planning, Middle Aged, New York City, Nutritional Status, Nutritive Value, Vegetables, Public Sector, Nutrition Policy, Young Adult, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review