How cooks navigate nutrition, hunger and care in public-sector foodservice settings
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To examine the perspectives and practices of cooks responsible for carrying out healthy meal programmes in publicly funded foodservice, in order to better understand what they consider to be ‘good’ food and where nutrition and nutritional standards fit into this conceptualization. Design: A qualitative, exploratory study involving in-depth interviews that were conducted with cooks and their supervisors about their work practices and perspectives on providing healthy food for clients. Setting: Participants were recruited from child-care, after-school, senior-centre and shelter settings that had participated in healthy menu training in New York City, USA. Subjects: Eighteen cooks and nine supervisors working in the aforementioned settings. Results: The views and practices of both cooks and supervisors about what constitutes ‘good’ food extend beyond a purely nutritional view of goodness to include the importance of addressing hunger and clients’ food preferences, among other factors. Cooks address these by interacting with clients and altering recipes and menus in a range of ways to maximize the likelihood of food consumption and enjoyment. These approaches are often, but not always, compatible with setting-specific nutritional guidelines that may be set at the national, state, local or organizational level. Conclusions: Cooks play a key role in translating nutritional guidelines into what is served. In doing so, they engage in skilled labour and forms of care that increase the ability of public-sector foodservice to address food security and other goals, but these aspects of their work are not widely recognized.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
En janvier 2021, 2 714 restaurants collectifs sont labellisés « En cuisine », soit une hausse de plus de 100 % en 2 ans.
“En janvier 2021, 2 714 le sont soit une hausse de plus de 100 % en 2 ans39”
From La transition agroécologique de la restauration collective en France : une mise en perspective multi-niveaux (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
The Methods section describes interviews with cooks at New York City foodservice sites, not French restaurants holding the « En cuisine » label. Searches for the label, the January 2021 count of 2,714, and the claimed two-year increase found no passage addressing those figures. The paper was published in 2016 and does not report a January 2021 count. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · Cited by 45,787 · see citing works
Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
Mays, N. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50 · Cited by 3,742 · see citing works
(2010) · VerKörperungen · doi:10.14361/transcript.9783839414477 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Contemporary Field Research : Perspectives and Formulations
Emerson, R. M. (2001) · Cited by 511 · see citing works
School Food Environments and Practices Affect Dietary Behaviors of US Public School Children
BRIEFEL, R. R., Crepinsek, M. K., Cabili, C., Wilson, A., & Gleason, P. (2009) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.059 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Kitchens: The Culture of Restaurant Work.
Zukin, S., & Fine, G. A. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076795 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Reproducing Labor Inequalities
Duffy, M. (2004) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243204269499 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Rethinking School Feeding Social Safety Nets, Child Development, and the Education SectorPreprint
Bundy, D. A. P., Burbano, C., Grosh, M., Gelli, A., Jukes, M., & Drake, L. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 197 · see citing works
School Lunch Waste Among Middle School Students
Cohen, J. F. W., Richardson, S., Austin, S. B., Economos, C. D., & Rimm, E. B. (2013) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.060 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Burbano, C., Bundy, D. A. P., Gelli, A., Grosh, M., Jukes, M., & Drake, L. (2009) · doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-7974-5 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics
(2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Free for all: fixing school food in America
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-0410 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Fung, C., McIsaac, J. D., Kuhle, S., Kirk, S., & Veugelers, P. J. (2013) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.016 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Poppendieck, J. (2019) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520944411 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
School Food and the Public Domain: The Politics of the Public Plate
Morgan, K. (2006) · The Political Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1467-923x.2006.00809.x · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Otsuki, K. (2011) · Natural Resources Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01392.x · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Improving the food environment in UK schools: Policy opportunities and challenges
Devi, A., Surender, R., & Rayner, M. (2010) · Journal of Public Health Policy · doi:10.1057/jphp.2010.9 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Developing and Implementing Health and Sustainability Guidelines for Institutional Food Service
Kimmons, J. E., Jones, S. J., McPeak, H. H., & Bowden, B. (2012) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.111.001354 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Tsui, E. K., Deutsch, J. M., Patinella, S., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301293 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationFeldman, C. H., Briceno‐Pinar, E. A., Konas, D. W., Ruskin, M. S., TONEY, J. H., & Wunderlich, S. M. (2009) · Journal of Foodservice · doi:10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00148.x · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Public Institutional Foodservice
Tsui, E. K. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_403-1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Institute of Medicine (2011) Child and Adult Care Food Program: Aligning Dietary Guidance for All. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- World Health Organization (2013) Global Nutrition Policy Review: What Does It Take to Scale Up Nutrition Action? Geneva: WHO.
- Mol A, Moser I & Pols J (2010) Care: putting practice into theory. In Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, pp. 7-26 [
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Magrini, M.-B., Fernandez-Inigo, H., Doré, A., & Pauly, O. (2021) · Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies · doi:10.1007/s41130-021-00146-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Fernandez-Inigo, H., Magrini, M.-B., & Doré, A. (2022) · Économie rurale · doi:10.4000/economierurale.10408 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tsui, E. K., & Morillo, A.
- Affiliations
- Lehman College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tsui, Emma K
- ORCID
- Tsui, Emma K
- Venue
- Public Health Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2015-07-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 946-954
- ISSN
- 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2727
- PMC
- PMC10270883
- OpenAlex
- W1951265392
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)
- Locations
- Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- City University of New York
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
- Keywords
- cooks, nutritional standards, hunger, food preferences, food security, care work, skilled workers, menu adaptation
- MeSH terms
- Whole Grains, Diet, Healthy, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cooking, Dietary Proteins, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Food Preferences, Food Services, Fruit, Humans, Hunger, Institutional Management Teams, Male, Menu Planning, Middle Aged, New York City, Nutritional Status, Nutritive Value, Vegetables, Public Sector, Nutrition Policy, Young Adult, Drinking Water
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review