The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reducing meat consumption in the USA: a nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Excess meat consumption, particularly of red and processed meats, is associated with nutritional and environmental health harms. While only a small portion of the population is vegetarian, surveys suggest many Americans may be reducing their meat consumption. To inform education campaigns, more information is needed about attitudes, perceptions, behaviours and foods eaten in meatless meals. Design: A web-based survey administered in April 2015 assessed meat reduction behaviours, attitudes, what respondents ate in meatless meals and sociodemographic characteristics. Setting: Nationally representative, web-based survey in the USA. Subjects: US adults (n 1112) selected from GfK Knowledgeworks’ 50 000-member online panel. Survey weights were used to assure representativeness. Results: Two-thirds reported reducing meat consumption in at least one category over three years, with reductions of red and processed meat most frequent. The most common reasons for reduction were cost and health; environment and animal welfare lagged. Non-meat reducers commonly agreed with statements suggesting that meat was healthy and ‘belonged’ in the diet. Vegetables were most often consumed ‘always’ in meatless meals, but cheese/dairy was also common. Reported meat reduction was most common among those aged 45–59 years and among those with lower incomes. Conclusions: The public and environmental health benefits of reducing meat consumption create a need for campaigns to raise awareness and contribute to motivation for change. These findings provide rich information to guide intervention development, both for the USA and other high-income countries that consume meat in high quantities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Micha, R., Wallace, S. K., & Mozaffarian, D. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.924977 · Cited by 1,244
Healthful and Unhealthful Plant-Based Diets and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in U.S. Adults
Satija, A., Bhupathiraju, S. N., Spiegelman, D., Chiuve, S. E., Manson, J. E., Willett, W., Rexrode, K. M., Rimm, E. B., & Hu, F. B. (2017) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.047 · Cited by 991
Pan, A., Sun, Q., Bernstein, A. M., Schulze, M. B., Manson, J. E., Willett, W. C., & Hu, F. B. (2011) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.018978 · Cited by 709
Meat Intake and Mortality: A Prospective Study of Over Half a Million People
Sinha, R., Cross, A. J., Graubard, B. I., Leitzmann, M. F., & Schatzkin, A. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.6 · Cited by 543 · cited 1×
“Excess consumption of meat, especially red and processed meats, is associated with health conditions including heart disease, stroke((6,7)), type 2 diabetes((6,8)), obesity((9)) and some cancers((4,5)).”
BackgroundWang, X., Lin, X., Ouyang, Y. Y., Liu, J., Zhao, G., Pan, A., & Hu, F. B. (2016) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980015002062 · Cited by 412
Red Meat Consumption and Risk of Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
Kaluza, J., Wolk, A., & Larsson, S. C. (2012) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.112.663286 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Food choice in transition: adolescent autonomy, agency, and the food environment
Neufeld, L. M., Andrade, E. B., Ballonoff Suleiman, A., Barker, M., Beal, T., Blum, L. S., Demmler, K. M., Dogra, S., Hardy-Johnson, P., Lahiri, A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01687-1 · Cited by 328
Cardello, A. V., Llobell, F., Giacalone, D., Roigard, C. M., & Jaeger, S. R. (2022) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104599 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Neff, R. A., Edwards, D., Palmer, A., Ramsing, R., Righter, A., & Wolfson, J.
- Venue
- Public Health Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-03-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1835-1844
- ISSN
- 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2727
- OpenAlex
- W2794941261
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reducing meat consumption in the USA: a nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1368980017004190
- The paper
- Neff, R. A., Edwards, D., Palmer, A., Ramsing, R., Righter, A., & Wolfson, J. (2018). Reducing meat consumption in the USA: a nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours. Public Health Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980017004190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.