Cited by 191Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Plant-Based Alternatives vs Dairy Milk: Consumer Segments and Their Sensory, Emotional, Cognitive and Situational Use Responses to Tasted Products

Open access
Cardello, Armand V., Llobell, Fabien, Giacalone, Davide, Roigard, Christina M., Jaeger, Sara R.·2022·Food Quality and Preference

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104599

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns regarding allergens, antinutritional factors, GMOs, and extensive use of soy as animal feed have stimulated interest in alternative protein sources.

    “Although soy has traditionally dominated this market because of its high protein content, mild flavor, and technofunctional properties, concerns regarding allergens, antinutritional factors, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), and its extensive use as animal feed have stimulated interest in alternative protein sources [22][23][24].”

    From Valorization of Microalgae as Multifunctional Protein Sources in Plant-Based Systems: Structural, Functional, and Processing Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The passage on plant-based alternatives to cow’s milk (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) says soy milk is common and lists other plant sources. Another passage in that section identifies dairy allergies as a reason for choosing plant-based milk, not soy-related concerns as a reason to seek other proteins. Searches for soy allergens, antinutritional factors, GMOs, and animal-feed use found no passage making the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Abdi, H., & Béra, M. (2014). Correspondence analysis. In R. Alhajj & J. Rokne (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social networks and mining (pp. 275-284). New York: Springer Verlag.
  2. Chen, S. (1989). Preparation of fluid soymilk. In T. H. Applewhite (Ed.), Proceedings of the world congress on vegetable protein utilization in human foods and animal feedstuffs (pp. 341-352).
  3. Euvepro. (2019). The use of plant-based proteins in foods and beverages in the EU. A 10-year review of new product launches containing plant-based proteins across EU 28. European Vegetable Protein Associate. Access on 10 Feb 2021 from https://euvepro.eu/_library/_files/INNOVA_2018_rep ort_summary_THE_USE_OF_PLANT- BASED_PROTEINS_IN_FOOD_AND_BEVERAGES_ IN_THE_EU.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cardello, A. V., Llobell, F., Giacalone, D., Roigard, C. M., & Jaeger, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Plant & Food Research (NZ)
Corresponding author
Jaeger, Sara R.
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
100
Pages
104599
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223946989
Cited by
191
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 9
FWCI
18.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
MBIE
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
plant-based milk alternatives, dairy milk, sensory perception, product liking, soy milk, oat milk, cashew milk, rice milk, coconut milk, full-fat dairy, check-all-that-apply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review