Prevalence thresholds for wasting, overweight and stunting in children under 5 years
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Prevalence ranges to classify levels of wasting and stunting have been used since the 1990s for global monitoring of malnutrition. Recent developments prompted a re-examination of existing ranges and development of new ones for childhood overweight. The present paper reports from the WHO–UNICEF Technical Expert Advisory Group on Nutrition Monitoring. Design: Thresholds were developed in relation to sd of the normative WHO Child Growth Standards. The international definition of ‘normal’ (2 sd below/above the WHO standards median) defines the first threshold, which includes 2·3 % of the area under the normalized distribution. Multipliers of this ‘very low’ level (rounded to 2·5 %) set the basis to establish subsequent thresholds. Country groupings using the thresholds were produced using the most recent set of national surveys. Setting: One hundred and thirty-four countries. Subjects: Children under 5 years. Results: For wasting and overweight, thresholds are: ‘very low’ (<2·5 %), ‘low’ (≈1–2 times 2·5 %), ‘medium’ (≈2–4 times 2·5 %), ‘high’ (≈4–6 times 2·5 %) and ‘very high’ (>≈6 times 2·5 %). For stunting, thresholds are: ‘very low’ (<2·5 %), ‘low’ (≈1–4 times 2·5 %), ‘medium’ (≈4–8 times 2·5 %), ‘high’ (≈8–12 times 2·5 %) and ‘very high’ (>≈12 times 2·5 %). Conclusions: The proposed thresholds minimize changes and keep coherence across anthropometric indicators. They can be used for descriptive purposes to map countries according to severity levels; by donors and global actors to identify priority countries for action; and by governments to trigger action and target programmes aimed at achieving ‘low’ or ‘very low’ levels. Harmonized terminology will help avoid confusion and promote appropriate interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chronic malnutrition in 2007 was considered high in MRML or very high in MLO by WHO thresholds.
“and considered as high (MRML) or very high (MLO) by WHO thresholds (de Onis et al., 2019).”
From Mother, child and adolescent health outcomes in two long-term refugee camp settings at the Thai-Myanmar border 2000–2018: a retrospective analysis (2024) · cites this paper as de Onis et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries
Black, R. E., Victora, C. G., Walker, S. P., Bhutta, Z. A., Christian, P., de Onis, M., Ezzati, M., Grantham-McGregor, S., Katz, J., Martorell, R., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60937-x · Cited by 8,475 · see citing works
Abarca-Gómez, L., Abdeen, Z. A., Hamid, Z. A., Abu-Rmeileh, N. M., Acosta-Cazares, B., Acuin, C., Adams, R. J., Aekplakorn, W., Afsana, K., Aguilar-Salinas, C. A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32129-3 · Cited by 7,482 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- [1]de Onis M, Monteiro C, Akre J et al. (1993) The worldwide magnitude of protein–energy malnutrition: an overview from the WHO Global Database on Child Growth. Bull World Health Organ 71, 703– 712. 8313488 PMC2393544
- [2]Dibley MJ, Goldsby JB, Staehling NW et al. (1987) Development of normalized curves for the international growth reference: historical and technical considerations. Am J Clin Nutr 46, 736– 748. 3314468
- [4]World Health Organization (1995) Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series no. 854. Geneva: WHO. 8594834
- [6]de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E et al. (2006) Comparison of the WHO Child Growth Standards and the NCHS/WHO international growth reference: implications for child health programmes. Public Health Nutr 9, 942– 947. 17010261
- [8]WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group (2006) WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl 450, 76– 85. 16817681
- [10]Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA et al. (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 371, 243– 260. 18207566
- [12]de Onis M & Blössner M (2000) Overweight prevalence and trends among preschool children in developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr 72, 1032– 1039. 11010948
- [13]de Onis M, Blössner M & Borghi B (2010) Global prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity among preschool children. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 1257– 1264. 20861173
- [14]de Onis M, Zeitlhuber J & Martínez-Costa C (2016) Nutritional disorders in the proposed 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases: feedback from a survey of stakeholders. Public Health Nutr 19, 3135– 3141. 27293047 PMC5217466
- [16]de Onis M & Branca F (2016) Childhood stunting: a global perspective. Matern Child Nutr 12, Suppl. 1, 12– 26. 27187907 PMC5084763
- [19]World Health Organization (2017) Guideline: Assessing and Managing Children at Primary Health-Care Facilities to Prevent Overweight and Obesity in the Context of the Double Burden of Malnutrition. Updates for the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI). Geneva: WHO. 29578661
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benner, M. T., Mohr, O., Kaloy, W., Sansoenboon, A., Moungsookjarean, A., Kaiser, P., Carrara, V. I., & McGready, R. (2024) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s146342362400015x · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Onis, M., Borghi, E., Arimond, M., Webb, P., Croft, T., Saha, K., De-Regil, L. M., Thuita, F., Heidkamp, R., Krasevec, J., Hayashi, C., & Flores-Ayala, R.
- Affiliations
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Tufts University (US)
- ICF International (United States) (US)
- University of Nairobi (KE)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- United Nations Children's Fund (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Public Health Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-10-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 175-179
- ISSN
- 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2727
- PMC
- PMC6390397
- OpenAlex
- W2896653578
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 24.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- World Health Organization
- UNICEF
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- prevalence threshold, wasting, stunting, childhood overweight, children under five, malnutrition, WHO Child Growth Standards, anthropometric indicators, severity classification, country grouping
- MeSH terms
- Anthropometry, Child, Preschool, Female, Growth Disorders, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Nutrition Surveys, Reference Standards, Child Nutrition Disorders, Prevalence, Wasting Syndrome, Overweight
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review