The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Archaeology, anarchism, decolonization, and degrowth through the lens of Frase’s four futures
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anarchist archaeologies imagine hopeful rather than dystopian futures, but dystopian futures are still possible.
“Anarchist archaeologies imagine hopeful rather than dystopian futures, but the latter are still possible (Flexner, 2021).”
From Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures (2024) · cites this paper as Flexner, 2021
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Fisher, 2009, Capitalist realism. Is there no alternative?
- 10.22459/TA51.2019.14 · DOI
- Menzies, 2020, Indigenous heritage narratives for cultural justice, Historic environment, 32, 54
- 10.1353/aiq.2006.0032 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5 · DOI
- 10.1080/00438243.2017.1333921 · DOI
- 10.1558/jca.33431 · DOI
- Kawelu, 2014, Community-based research. The next step in Hawaiian archaeology, Journal of Pacific archaeology, 5, 62
- 10.1558/jca.33439 · DOI
- Frase, 2016, Life after capitalism
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures
Collective, B. T., Berihuete‐Azorín, M., Blackmore, C., Borck, L., Flexner, J. L., Frieman, C. J., Herrmann, C. A., & Kiddey, R. (2024) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13940 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Flexner, J.
- Venue
- Archaeological Dialogues
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2021-05-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-19
- ISSN
- 1380-2038
- 1478-2294
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
