The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification, measurement and interpretation of tree rings in woody species from mediterranean climates
Abstract
We review the literature dealing with mediterranean climate, vegetation, phenology and ecophysiology relevant to the understanding of tree‐ring formation in mediterranean regions. Tree rings have been used extensively in temperate regions to reconstruct responses of forests to past environmental changes. In mediterranean regions, studies of tree rings are scarce, despite their potential for understanding and predicting the effects of global change on important ecological processes such as desertification. In mediterranean regions, due to the great spatio‐temporal variability of mediterranean environmental conditions, tree rings are sometimes not formed. Often, clear seasonality is lacking, and vegetation activity is not always associated with regular dormancy periods. We present examples of tree‐ring morphology of five species (Arbutus unedo, Fraxinus ornus, Quercus cerris, Q. ilex, Q. pubescens) sampled in Tuscany, Italy, focusing on the difficulties we encountered during the dating. We present an interpretation of anomalies found in the wood structure and, more generally, of cambial activity in such environments. Furthermore, we propose a classification of tree‐ring formation in mediterranean environments. Mediterranean tree rings can be dated and used for dendrochronological purposes, but great care should be taken in selecting sampling sites, species and sample trees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anatolian tree rings and the absolute chronology of the eastern Mediterranean, 2220–718 BC
Kuniholm, P. I., Kromer, B., Manning, S. W., Newton, M., Latini, C. E., & Bruce, M. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381780a0 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Olive Tree-Ring Problematic Dating: A Comparative Analysis on Santorini (Greece)
Cherubini, P., Humbel, T., Beeckman, H., Gärtner, H., Mannes, D., Pearson, C., Schoch, W., Tognetti, R., & Lev-Yadun, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054730 · Cited by 84
Self-citationEhrlich, Y., Regev, L., & Boaretto, E. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29392-9 · Cited by 19
Ehrlich, Y., Regev, L., & Boaretto, E. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79024-4 · Cited by 16
Manning, S. W. (2024) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2024.44 · Cited by 9
“Hence olives have been stated to be problematic for dendrochronology as no regular, annual, growth increment can be recognized in many cases, and instead intra-annual density fluctuations are observed or anticipated (Cherubini et al. 2003, 2013; Kuniholm 2014).”
BackgroundBronze Age catastrophe and modern controversy: dating the Santorini eruption
(2014) · Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0003598x00050353 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- CHERUBINI, P., GARTNER, B. L., TOGNETTI, R., BRÄKER, O. U., SCHOCH, W., & INNES, J. L.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-148
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2109735588
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification, measurement and interpretation of tree rings in woody species from mediterranean climates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1464793102006000
- The paper
- CHERUBINI, P., GARTNER, B. L., TOGNETTI, R., BRÄKER, O. U., SCHOCH, W., & INNES, J. L. (2003). Identification, measurement and interpretation of tree rings in woody species from mediterranean climates. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793102006000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.