The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity and classification of mycorrhizal associations
Abstract
Most mycorrhizas are‘balanced’mutualistic associations in which the fungus and plant exchange commodities required for their growth and survival. Myco‐heterotrophic plants have‘exploitative'mycorrhizas where transfer processes apparently benefit only plants. Exploitative associations are symbiotic (in the broad sense), but are not mutualistic. A new definition of mycorrhizas that encompasses all types of these associations while excluding other plant‐fungus interactions is provided. This definition recognises the importance of nutrient transfer at an interface resulting from synchronised plant‐fungus development. The diversity of interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and plants is considered. Mycorrhizal fungi also function as endophytes, necrotrophs and antagonists of host or non‐host plants, with roles that vary during the lifespan of their associations. It is recommended that mycorrhizal associations are defined and classified primarily by anatomical criteria regulated by the host plant. A revised classification scheme for types and categories of mycorrhizal associations defined by these criteria is proposed. The main categories of vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal associations (VAM) are and of ectomycorrhizal associations (ECM) are‘epidermal’epidermal ECM occur in certain host plants. Fungus‐controlled features result in categories of VAM and ECM. Arbutoid and monotropoid associations should be considered subcategories of epidermal ECM and ectendomycorrhizas should be relegated to an ECM morphotype. Both arbuscules and vesicles define mycorrhizas formed by glomeromycotan fungi. A new classification scheme for categories, subcategories and morphotypes of mycorrhizal associations is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mycorrhizae Influence Tropical Succession
Janos, D. P. (1980) · Biotropica · doi:10.2307/2388157 · Cited by 522
Cited by
Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global host plant diversity
Brundrett, M. C., & Tedersoo, L. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14976 · Cited by 1,615
Self-citationTedersoo, L., May, T. W., & Smith, M. E. (2010) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-009-0274-x · Cited by 1,016
Guo, D., Xia, M., Wei, X., Chang, W., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02573.x · Cited by 687
Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review
Niu, Y. F., Chai, R. S., Jin, G. L., Wang, H., Tang, C. X., & Zhang, Y. S. (2013) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs285 · Cited by 617
Metadata
- Authors
- Brundrett, M.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 473-495
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2118571672
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and classification of mycorrhizal associations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1464793103006316
- The paper
- Brundrett, M. (2004). Diversity and classification of mycorrhizal associations. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793103006316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.