Cited by 6Space Science and Extraterrestrial LifePlanetary Science and ExplorationSpaceflight effects on biology

Exposure to low Earth orbit of an extreme-tolerant cyanobacterium as a contribution to lunar astrobiology activities

Billi, Daniela, Mosca, Claudia, Fagliarone, Claudia, Napoli, Alessandro, Verseux, Cyprien, Baqué, Mickael, de Vera, Jean-Pierre·2020·International Journal of Astrobiology

Abstract

Abstract By investigating the survival and the biomarker detectability of a rock-inhabiting cyanobacterium, Chroococcidiopsis sp. CCMEE 029, the BIOMEX space experiment might contribute to a future exploitation of the Moon as a test-bed for key astrobiology tasks such as the testing of life-detection technologies and the study of life in space. Post-flight analyses demonstrated that the mixing of dried cells with sandstone and a lunar regolith simulant provided protection against space UV radiation. During the space exposure, dried cells not mixed with minerals were killed by 2.05 × 102 kJ m−2 of UV radiation, while cells mixed with sandstone or lunar regolith survived 1.59 × 102 and 1.79 × 102 kJ m−2, respectively. No differences in survival occurred among cells mixed and not mixed with minerals and exposed to space conditions in the dark; this finding suggests that space vacuum and 0.5 Gy of ionizing radiation did not impair the cells’ presence in space. The genomic DNA of dead cells was severely damaged but still detectable with PCR amplification of a short target, thus suggesting that short sequences should be targeted in a PCR-based approach when searching for traces of life. The enhanced stability of genomic DNA of dried cells mixed with minerals and exposed to space indicates that DNA might still be detectable after prolonged periods, possibly up to millions of years in microbes shielded by minerals. Overall, the BIOMEX results contribute to future experiments regarding the exposure of cells and their biomarkers to deep space conditions in order to further test the lithopanspermia hypothesis, the biomarker stability and the microbial endurance, with implications for planetary protection and to determine if the Moon has been contaminated during past human missions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1473550419000168

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Billi, D., Mosca, C., Fagliarone, C., Napoli, A., Verseux, C., Baqué, M., & de Vera, J.-P.
Affiliations
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • University of Bremen (DE)
Corresponding author
Billi, Daniela
Venue
International Journal of Astrobiology
Published
2019-07-18
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
53-60
ISSN
  • 1473-5504 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3006
OpenAlex
W2963631456
Cited by
6
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Astrobiology (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
Keywords
Chroococcidiopsis, space exposure, low Earth orbit, lunar regolith simulant, sandstone, ultraviolet radiation, microbial survival, biomarker detection, life detection, lithopanspermia, planetary protection, ionizing radiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review