The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User Involvement in Research and Evaluation: Liberation or Regulation?
Abstract
This article explores the progressive and regressive potential of ‘user involvement’ in research and evaluation, with particular reference to social policy. There is growing political and research interest in user involvement. This article critically explores key different approaches to user involvement in research and relates them to consumerist and democratic models of involvement in policy and practice, management and development. The article highlights the need to approach user involvement in research critically and systematically, taking account of the diversity of approaches that have developed and to take forward user involvement in research in equal association with service user organisations and movements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oliver, M. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1 · Cited by 4,227
Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice
OLIVER, M. J. (1995) · Cited by 2,347
Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?
Oliver, M. (1992) · Disability, Handicap & Society · doi:10.1080/02674649266780141 · Cited by 1,119
Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future
Campbell, J., & OLIVER, M. J. (1996) · Cited by 554
Croft, S., & Beresford, P. (1992) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/026101839201203502 · Cited by 183
Self-citation'Anti-oppressive practice': emancipation or appropriation?
Wilson, A. (2000) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/30.5.553 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Beresford, P. (2005) · Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale · doi:10.1017/s1121189x0000186x · Cited by 145
Self-citationThe power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research
Locock, L., Boylan, A., Snow, R., & Staniszewska, S. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12519 · Cited by 128
Smith, E., Ross, F., Donovan, S., Manthorpe, J., Brearley, S., Sitzia, J., & Beresford, P. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.09.010 · Cited by 113
Self-citationEvaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: a prospective case study
Barber, R., Beresford, P., Boote, J., Cooper, C., & Faulkner, A. (2011) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01017.x · Cited by 107
Self-citationSnape, D., Kirkham, J., Preston, J., Popay, J., Britten, N., Collins, M., Froggatt, K., Gibson, A., Lobban, F., Wyatt, K., et al. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004217 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Beresford, P.
- Venue
- Social Policy and Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-03-28
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-105
- ISSN
- 1474-7464 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3073
- OpenAlex
- W2139359289
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: User Involvement in Research and Evaluation: Liberation or Regulation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1474746402000222
- The paper
- Beresford, P. (2002). User Involvement in Research and Evaluation: Liberation or Regulation? Social Policy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746402000222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
