The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice and Democratic Debate
Abstract
Issues surrounding the role and provision of evidence to inform policy and practice have become topical and problematic. The context of these controversies is discussed, with particular emphasis on systematic approaches to synthesising research evidence. We contrast the ‘positivist’ emphasis with interpretative qualitative synthesis, and suggest that many of the viewpoints have become unnecessarily and unhelpfully polarised. The methods for systematic research syntheses will vary as they depend on the question being asked. The process is transparent, allowing readers to see how conclusions have been reached, and forms the basis of reviews which can be updated to help provide sustainable and relevant evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006) · Lancaster University · doi:10.13140/2.1.1018.4643 · Cited by 2,070
Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don’t
Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2009) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.001 · Cited by 1,146
Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12102 · Cited by 995
O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., Miwa, M., & Ananiadou, S. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-5 · Cited by 681
The Benefits and Challenges of Using Systematic Reviews in International Development Research
Mallett, R., Hagen-Zanker, J., Slater, R., & Duvendack, M. (2012) · Journal of Development Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19439342.2012.711342 · Cited by 565
Metadata
- Authors
- Gough, D., & Elbourne, D.
- Venue
- Social Policy and Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-06-24
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-236
- ISSN
- 1474-7464 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3073
- OpenAlex
- W2124542805
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice and Democratic Debate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s147474640200307x
- The paper
- Gough, D., & Elbourne, D. (2002). Systematic Research Synthesis to Inform Policy, Practice and Democratic Debate. Social Policy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147474640200307x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
