Which Employers Offer Hope for Mainstream Job Opportunities for Disabled People?
Abstract
Employer reluctance to hire disabled people narrows the economic and vocational opportunities of disabled people. This study investigates employer hiring decisions to identify which mainstream employers are most likely to hire disabled people. The study reports findings from interviews with eighty-seven employers in urban and regional South Australia. Analysis reveals differences across groups of employers based on their previous hiring behaviour. Communication from employment support agencies should specifically address concerns of non-hirers and light hirers. Long-term financial concerns present strong but surmountable barriers to light hirers employing disabled people. Policy mitigating long-term employer concerns could attract employers to hire disabled people for the first time (non-hirers) or return to hiring (light hirers) disabled people. Negative employers (antagonists) and employers already sustaining ongoing workplace relationships with disabled people (loyals) have insurmountable reasons to not hire any (or more) disabled people and should not be targeted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One prejudice that continues to affect people with disabilities is that they are perceived to not want to work at all.
“one prejudice that continues to affect people with disabilities is that they are perceived to not want to work at all”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Hemphill & Kulik, 2016
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Employees' attitudes toward organizational change: A literature review
Choi, M. (2011) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20434 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Hernandez, B., McDonald, K., Divilbiss, M., Horin, E., Velcoff, J., & Donoso, O. (2008) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/s10672-008-9063-5 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Employer benefits and costs of employing a person with a disability
Graffam, J., Smith, K., Shinkfield, A., & Polzin, U. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation · doi:10.3233/jvr-2002-00165 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hemphill, E., & Kulik, C. T.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Social Policy and Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2015-08-26
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 537-554
- ISSN
- 1474-7464 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3073
- OpenAlex
- W1945144332
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Policy and Society (publishedVersion)
- UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Keywords
- people with disabilities, hiring decisions, employment of people with disabilities, employer perceptions, workplace inclusion, South Australia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review