Cited by 34Disability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Which Employers Offer Hope for Mainstream Job Opportunities for Disabled People?

Hemphill, Elizabeth, Kulik, Carol T.·2016·Social Policy and Society

Abstract

Employer reluctance to hire disabled people narrows the economic and vocational opportunities of disabled people. This study investigates employer hiring decisions to identify which mainstream employers are most likely to hire disabled people. The study reports findings from interviews with eighty-seven employers in urban and regional South Australia. Analysis reveals differences across groups of employers based on their previous hiring behaviour. Communication from employment support agencies should specifically address concerns of non-hirers and light hirers. Long-term financial concerns present strong but surmountable barriers to light hirers employing disabled people. Policy mitigating long-term employer concerns could attract employers to hire disabled people for the first time (non-hirers) or return to hiring (light hirers) disabled people. Negative employers (antagonists) and employers already sustaining ongoing workplace relationships with disabled people (loyals) have insurmountable reasons to not hire any (or more) disabled people and should not be targeted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1474746415000457

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hemphill, E., & Kulik, C. T.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Venue
Social Policy and Society
Published
2015-08-26
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
537-554
ISSN
  • 1474-7464 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3073
OpenAlex
W1945144332
Cited by
34
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Policy and Society (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
people with disabilities, hiring decisions, employment of people with disabilities, employer perceptions, workplace inclusion, South Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review