Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring quality of life at the end of life: Validation of the QUAL-E

STEINHAUSER, KAREN E., CLIPP, ELIZABETH C., BOSWORTH, HAYDEN B., MCNEILLY, MAYA, CHRISTAKIS, NICHOLAS A., VOILS, CORRINE I., TULSKY, JAMES A.·2004·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

Objectives:To validate the QUAL-E, a new measure of quality of life at the end of life. Methods:We conducted a cross-sectional study to assess the instrument's psychometric properties, including the QUAL-E's associations with existing measures, evaluation of robustness across diverse sample groups, and stability over time. The study was conducted at the VA and Duke University Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina, in 248 patients with stage IV cancer, congestive heart failure with ejection fraction ≤20%, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with FEV 1≤ 1.0 l, or dialysis-dependent end stage renal disease. The main outcome measures included QUAL-E and five comparison measures: FACIT quality of life measure, Missoula-VITAS Quality of Life Index, FACIT-SP spirituality measures, Participatory Decision Making Scale (MOS), and Duke EPESE social support scales. Results:QUAL-E analyses confirmed a four-domain structure (25 items):life completion(α = 0.80),symptoms impact(α = 0.87),relationship with health care provider(α = 0.71), and preparation for end of life(α = 0.68). Convergent and discriminant validity were demonstrated with multiple comparison measures. Test–retest reliability assessment showed stable scores over a 1-week period. Significance of results:The QUAL-E, a brief measure of quality of life at the end of life, demonstrates acceptable validity and reliability, is easy to administer, performs consistently across diverse demographic and disease groups, and is acceptable to seriously ill patients. It is offered as a new instrument to assist in the evaluation of the quality and effectiveness of interventions targeting improved care at the end of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1478951504040027

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
STEINHAUSER, K. E., CLIPP, E. C., BOSWORTH, H. B., MCNEILLY, M., CHRISTAKIS, N. A., VOILS, C. I., & TULSKY, J. A.
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2004-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
3-14
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W2082733011
Cited by
209
References
4
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring quality of life at the end of life: Validation of the QUAL-E. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1478951504040027
The paper
STEINHAUSER, K. E., CLIPP, E. C., BOSWORTH, H. B., MCNEILLY, M., CHRISTAKIS, N. A., VOILS, C. I., & TULSKY, J. A. (2004). Measuring quality of life at the end of life: Validation of the QUAL-E. Palliative and Supportive Care. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951504040027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.