Cited by 1,781Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareCancer survivorship and care

Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Zimmermann, Camilla, Swami, Nadia, Krzyzanowska, Monika, Hannon, Breffni, Leighl, Natasha, Oza, Amit, Moore, Malcolm, Rydall, Anne +4 more·2014·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Patients with advanced cancer have reduced quality of life, which tends to worsen towards the end of life. We assessed the effect of early palliative care in patients with advanced cancer on several aspects of quality of life.Methods The study took place at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada), between Dec 1, 2006, and Feb 28, 2011. 24 medical oncology clinics were cluster randomised (in a 1:1 ratio, using a computer-generated sequence, stratified by clinic size and tumour site [four lung, eight gastrointestinal, four genitourinary, six breast, two gynaecological]), to consultation and follow-up (at least monthly) by a palliative care team or to standard cancer care. Complete masking of interventions was not possible; however, patients provided written informed consent to participate in their own study group, without being informed of the existence of another group. Eligible patients had advanced cancer, European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and a clinical prognosis of 6-24 months. Quality of life (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy--Spiritual Well-Being [FACIT-Sp] scale and Quality of Life at the End of Life [QUAL-E] scale), symptom severity (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]), satisfaction with care (FAMCARE-P16), and problems with medical interactions (Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System Medical Interaction Subscale [CARES-MIS]) were measured at baseline and monthly for 4 months. The primary outcome was change score for FACIT-Sp at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included change score for FACIT-Sp at 4 months and change scores for other scales at 3 and 4 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01248624.Findings 461 patients completed baseline measures (228 intervention, 233 control); 393 completed at least one follow-up assessment. At 3-months, there was a non-significant difference in change score for FACIT-Sp between intervention and control groups (3·56 points [95% CI -0·27 to 7·40], p=0·07), a significant difference in QUAL-E (2·25 [0·01 to 4·49], p=0·05) and FAMCARE-P16 (3·79 [1·74 to 5·85], p=0·0003), and no difference in ESAS (-1·70 [-5·26 to 1·87], p=0·33) or CARES-MIS (-0·66 [-2·25 to 0·94], p=0·40). At 4 months, there were significant differences in change scores for all outcomes except CARES-MIS. All differences favoured the intervention group.Interpretation Although the difference in quality of life was non-significant at the primary endpoint, this trial shows promising findings that support early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer.Funding Canadian Cancer Society, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62416-2

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmermann, C., Swami, N., Krzyzanowska, M., Hannon, B., Leighl, N., Oza, A., Moore, M., Rydall, A., Rodin, G., Tannock, I., Donner, A., & Lo, C.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
383
Issue
9930
Pages
1721-1730
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2103903454
Cited by
1,781
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 142 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 191 · 2020: 175 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 166 · 2017: 163 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 113 · 2014: 39
FWCI
142.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Cancer Society (CZ) and by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (017257 and 020509)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
early palliative care, advanced cancer, quality of life, spiritual well-being, symptom severity, satisfaction with care, medical interaction, palliative care team, end-of-life care, FACIT-Sp, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, symptom management, quality of life interventions
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Ontario, Outpatient Clinics, Hospital, Palliative Care, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Early Medical Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review