Cited by 23Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPalliative and Oncologic CareCancer survivorship and care

A pilot study of transformation, attributed meanings to the illness, and spiritual well-being for terminally ill cancer patients

Ando, Michiyo, Morita, Tatsuya, Lee, Virginia, Okamoto, Takuya·2008·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

Objective The present study investigated what types of transformation terminally ill cancer patients experienced from diagnosis until the terminal stage, what meanings terminally ill cancer patients attributed to their illness, and whether or not those who attributed positive meaning to their illness achieved high levels of spiritual well-being as a preliminary study. Method Ten terminally ill cancer patients in the hospice wards of two general hospitals participated. A clinical psychologist conducted a semistructured interview with the patients individually for about 60 min. Patients completed the FACIT-Sp and HADS before the interview and talked about the meanings of cancer experience. The contents of the interviews were analyzed qualitatively. Patients were separated into high and low levels of spiritual-well being by the median of FACIT-Sp scores. Results Three types of transformation were extracted: "group with peaceful mind," "group with both positive attitude and uneasy feeling," and "groups with uneasy feeling." As attributed meanings to the illness, five categories were extracted: "positive meaning," "natural acceptance," "negative acceptance," "search for meaning," and "regret and sorrow." Patients in the high level spiritual well-being group attributed the meaning of illness to "positive meaning" and "natural acceptance," and those in the low level spiritual well-being group attributed it to "regret and sorrow" and "search for meaning." Significance of results Some…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1478951508000539

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ando, M., Morita, T., Lee, V., & Okamoto, T.
Affiliations
  • St. Mary's College (JP)
  • Seirei Mikatabara General Hospital (JP)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Ando, Michiyo
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2008-11-13
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
335-340
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W2153385761
Cited by
23
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
terminal cancer, spiritual well-being, meaning of illness, hospice patients, acceptance of illness, FACIT-Sp, Japanese cancer patients
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Anecdotes as Topic, Attitude to Death, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Medicine, Social Support, Terminally Ill, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review