Cited by 11Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareNursing care and research

The development and evaluation of a multimedia resource for family carers of patients receiving palliative care: a consumer-led project

Thomas, Kristina, Moore, Gaye·2015·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

Objective Previous intervention research has shown that group education sessions for carers are effective but not always feasible due to the demands of the caregiving role and the difficulty in getting carers to attend. This project was a consumer-led research initiative to develop and evaluate a multimedia resource (DVD) providing information and support for carers of people receiving palliative care. Method Eight carers were recruited from a community palliative care service to form a steering committee for the project. In collaboration with two researchers, the committee discussed the topics that would be included in the resource, developed an interview guide, participated in the filmed interviews, and developed the evaluation program. The steering committee participated in a focus group as part of the evaluation to elicit their experiences of the project. An evaluation was conducted that included the following: questionnaires for 29 carers and 17 palliative care health professionals; follow-up telephone interviews with carers; a focus group with health professionals; and a focus group with the Carer Steering Committee. Results The carers and health professionals reported that the DVD was informative (93 and 94%, respectively), realistic (96 and 88%), supportive (93 and 88%), and helpful (83 and 100%). All health professionals and carers reported that they would recommend the resource to carers. Carers on the steering committee reported substantial benefits that involved t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1478951513001090

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, K., & Moore, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Kristina
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2014-02-06
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
417-423
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W2073674432
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
family caregivers, palliative care, multimedia educational resources, DVD, caregiver education, caregiver support, health professional perspectives
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Palliative Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers, Focus Groups, Multimedia, Health Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review