The development and evaluation of a multimedia resource for family carers of patients receiving palliative care: a consumer-led project
Abstract
Objective Previous intervention research has shown that group education sessions for carers are effective but not always feasible due to the demands of the caregiving role and the difficulty in getting carers to attend. This project was a consumer-led research initiative to develop and evaluate a multimedia resource (DVD) providing information and support for carers of people receiving palliative care. Method Eight carers were recruited from a community palliative care service to form a steering committee for the project. In collaboration with two researchers, the committee discussed the topics that would be included in the resource, developed an interview guide, participated in the filmed interviews, and developed the evaluation program. The steering committee participated in a focus group as part of the evaluation to elicit their experiences of the project. An evaluation was conducted that included the following: questionnaires for 29 carers and 17 palliative care health professionals; follow-up telephone interviews with carers; a focus group with health professionals; and a focus group with the Carer Steering Committee. Results The carers and health professionals reported that the DVD was informative (93 and 94%, respectively), realistic (96 and 88%), supportive (93 and 88%), and helpful (83 and 100%). All health professionals and carers reported that they would recommend the resource to carers. Carers on the steering committee reported substantial benefits that involved t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most educational resources in palliative care are designed for patients, despite caregivers' preference for materials tailored to their specific needs.
“Likewise, most educational resources in palliative care are designed for patients, despite caregivers' preference for materials tailored to their specific needs.22,23”
From Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of CareSTEPS: A Supportive Care Intervention for the Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rangel, M. L., Milbury, K., Kayser, K., Ripley, R. T., Kvale, E., & Badr, H. (2024) · JTO Clinical and Research Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100736 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“22,23 Targeted interventions that provide caregivers with tools for effective caregiving is a more comprehensive approach that has great potential for improving caregiver mental health and enhancing supportive care for patients with advanced LC. Building on our previous work in LC, 24,25 we…”
- Authors
- Thomas, K., & Moore, G.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Thomas, Kristina
- Venue
- Palliative and Supportive Care
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-02-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-423
- ISSN
- 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-9523
- OpenAlex
- W2073674432
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Keywords
- family caregivers, palliative care, multimedia educational resources, DVD, caregiver education, caregiver support, health professional perspectives
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Palliative Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers, Focus Groups, Multimedia, Health Information Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review